Did anyone notice they revised the criteria and removed the requirement to have a decline in positive tests? Now it’s in a more vague category. I wonder if this means they’re gonna go forward with stage 3 even with an increase in positive cases... Sneaky
10 replies (most recent on top)
Payne needs to call it a day and take an EOI
Watching David Payne in that video is like being Winston in Novel 1984 looking at the viewing screen!
Will I be taken to Room 101 for reprogramming arghhhhh
The phased approach of bring employees back to work is bogus. This is the reason WHY:
FACT : There are in fact more people infected with the virus now in San Ramon compared with when sheltering in place was started.
The city has basically decided to sacrifice lives in order to bring the economy back.
ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW
THe PROPAGANDA ON TV and INTERNAL TO CHEVRON iS PROGRAMMING YOU TOP BELIEVE ITS OKAY
IT'S THOUGHT CONTROL
WELCOME TO 1984
AND YOU THINK YOU ARE FREE
LOL
It’s called moving of the goal posts. Reminds me of the strategy of another powerful regime
I know Exxon pushed and a typically closed because of CV in the office
Actually it looks like they are still using the same metric of positive cases, but also in conjunction with others like hospital beds, testing availability, etc. to allow health group assess situation based on more metrics not less. This sounds better to me. Some of these states going wrong direction now used Only a single metric to re-open. Here in Houston Chevron has been much more cautious than Exxon, Philips 66 and others that pushed a lot of people back to office weeks ago.
So when do you think they will bring back workers into the office?
If that is true, it really is c-appy! I had more faith in them than that...almost proud. I hope they don’t get stupid! What are the chances?
Yes. Shady, very poorly explained, bad timing, but more flexibility for them to do as they please with appropriate cover.
Hasn’t that always been the wording?