Thread regarding ExxonMobil Corp. layoffs

Employee cost vs. dividend

Just a thought experiment for thought experiments sake....

If all 75,000 employees are laid off and we assume each employee cost ~$300,000 it would save the company $22.5 billion.

From published earnings report:
The dividend cost $14.7 billion
Capital expenditure plan $19 billion
Cash on hand $12 billion
Brent & WTI ~ $41/bbl

& A promise not to borrow any more money.

Just assumed the layoffs would have a bigger impact at achieving the objective vs the deficit. Interesting to just layout the numbers plain.

Dallas and planning have a serious task ahead. True magicians if it all works out without adding to the debt or selling some serious assets. Dallas and Spring playing the game on hard mode with employees who are at their lowest.

Best of luck to all.

by
| 3231 views | | 10 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+16V0ntjy

10 replies (most recent on top)

On a spending topic: page 23 of 2019 Summary Annual Report. 2.5 million acres for $3-4B (price of the entry into contry with questionable ecomonics due to aggressive government take, GOM could of been easier) to get to 2025 vision. Did you hear about any big ExxonMobil discoveries in Brazil?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @szu+16V0ntjy

At this point. PBF is in a better financial place the exxonmobil is. Is it that much of a loss to be sold off into a less toxic environment?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kzf+16V0ntjy

That is an interesting way to look at it, thank you. Presume we can all conclude some major multi-billion asset sales are coming to make the balance sheet work.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xji+16V0ntjy

Why did we spend over $1 billion on a butyl plant in Singapore that has never been commercially operated?

Why have we sunk over half a billion $ (and counting) into an elastomers plant in Baytown that will never run (poor design)?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @obx+16V0ntjy

But also, why did we spend $10B on the Spring Campus?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hwh+16V0ntjy

@evo hit the nail on the head. Headcount reductions isn’t just about the dividend. There’s not enough work. This isn’t a charity. It’s a business.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vlk+16V0ntjy

Wow. So insightful. You figured out how basic staffing works

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lbq+16V0ntjy

Here's another thought experiment. With much capital and expense work being kicked out of the next year / years, where is all the work that our employees would supposedly be doing? Why do we need so many people at the company sitting around, getting paid, doing nothing of real value to the corporation?

What if, the headcount reductions is mainly to make up for the lack of work? What if the HW3 and TMTS is to adjust the company workforce to be more efficient. What about the company not using headcount to make up the difference in dividend.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @evo+16V0ntjy

That's not a thought experiment.

You simply thought you saw a putty cat.
And you did.
It was neither dead nor alive.
Maybe that's the experiment part.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jpu+16V0ntjy

Nothing like kicking while their down right

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @syx+16V0ntjy

Post a reply

: