Thread regarding ExxonMobil Corp. layoffs

Binge-hiring

74,900 regular employees at the end of 2019. 71,000 at the end of 2018. 69,600 at the end of 2017. 71,100 at the end of 2016 and 73,500 at the end of 2015.

Difference between the end of 2017 and the end of 2019 employee-count is = 5,300.

Assuming a retiring population of 3% = ~2,000 per year, betwen end of 2017 and end of 2019, 4,000 employees would have retired.

The total employee count still went up by 5,300, which means 9,300 people were hired!

2016 saw the oil-price crash and company borrow billions to pay the dividend. What was the need for this hiring binge - to double the earnings?

All those laid off in 2020, will pay a partial price for this hiring frenzy! Poor planning, poor performance and poor execution in everything by the top-performers (aka decision makers) - in the end, they identify some as the bottom performers and PIP them!

Travesty!!

by
| 3248 views | | 8 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+17JNjgDt

8 replies (most recent on top)

@ovk+17JNjgDt

Well said!

If oil-price were to go back to $100/bbl next month, albeit magically, everything will be hunky-dory and the management will look spectacular!

The same meritorious people that were running the business with ~$40B/yr profits made the decision on XTO.

In the end, it’s all about the price of the commodity that makes one look good or bad. Rest of the talk about meritocracy is all fake!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nya+17JNjgDt

Very little of the hiring went into the Growth ventures. Overhead grew instead. Need better management of overhead, like IT projects

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ufl+17JNjgDt

The reason for hiring was the growth strategy and the mega ventures that have been communicated to employees and investors. Th growth of low cost centers has also contributed. Headcount growth plans were reviewed and approved. Many might have thought at the time that it was a wrong strategy but at least it was consistent with our message. One observation though is that the execution indeed it had a feeling of hiring panic. We seemed to be indiscriminate particularly towards experienced professionals. Anything shiny was hired. Not surprised that many recent hires were put in the NSI category and it was not their fault. As always, by the time the plan was executed and the results were assessed, managers have moved at least once so no accountability on the quality of these hiring classes.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @arb+17JNjgDt

@lcf+17JNjgDt

They were hired because they are the best at the time. They are let go because we found replacements that we believe will be better. That is the who basis of what the PIP program is for.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @epc+17JNjgDt

If the people laid off lack skills and value, then why were they hired?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lcf+17JNjgDt

The last two years they seemed to be on a hiring frenzy, I watched this was surprised and did not understood. I am not sure what part of the strategy required this much hiring, but did not work too well.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sln+17JNjgDt

I wholeheartedly agree! I worked for Exxon for 28 years and finally got fed up and retired while an upper level operations manager - shortly before the Mobil merger. I got sick of the empire-building and other wasteful c-ap, like the Continuous Improvement Program (where they wasted a ton of money on “experts” who didn’t know beans about the oil business) and OIMS (Operations Integrity Management System) - a sad attempt by upper management to lay blame for anything bad that happened unto lower management levels. The whole outfit functioned like a government bureaucracy. I don’t own a single share of their stock.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bhr+17JNjgDt

Finally the truth - headcount problem is largely caused by bad strategy. But zero accountability from the leadership. Just need to lay off people because they lack skills and values! What are the skills and values of our executives?????

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ovk+17JNjgDt

Post a reply

: