Thread regarding ExxonMobil Corp. layoffs

Which oil company is the best managed as of today?

by
| 2671 views | | 18 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1e59AJtK

18 replies (most recent on top)

CVX is all smoke and mirrors. RDS is like a parody of a modern company, like a year of Dilbert cartoons. BP, same. COP has this weird atmosphere like mom and dad have decided to get a divorce but haven't told you. Repsol, same.
Marathon is supposed to be good. Aramco, very good. Equinor, good. Citgo, don't know anymore. Total, same. BR is a disaster. Pemex, same. Oxy, same.. Ecopetrol used to be sound at business but too much driven by politics at home.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5vcb+1e59AJtK

Wrong. QP has a back stabbing culture lead by citizens with zero knowledge of their job positions.

Citizenship is far more important than expertise.

QP only succeeds because it has such good assets and T’s and C’s that id--ts could be profitable.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1wce+1e59AJtK

QP (now QE)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1rwz+1e59AJtK

“Which oil company is the best managed as of today?”

Trick question; they’re all managed terribly.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1iuu+1e59AJtK

Left Shell for ExxonMobil because pay is much better here, maybe the difference is narrowing now. Still think ExxonMobil is better.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1obi+1e59AJtK

EOG without a doubt.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1iwl+1e59AJtK

Gots to agree with your first respondent - Aramco, SinoPet, Rosneft.
The trains run on time.
Just get out of the way.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1duw+1e59AJtK

Right now I think the clear answer would be a mid sized operator. Probably a Devon or Diamondback. Diamondback as an example acquired assets when prices were low. They also are very focused on where they have expertise, so divested assets that were non-core to them. Also employ creative strategies to access capital markets and maximize the value of mineral rights.

Longer term is tough. Itll be very interesting to see how Total and BPs strategies play out. Both have clear theses and frameworks to execute. Time will tell if it goes according to plan, but I think there is a fair chance of success

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1joj+1e59AJtK

Chevron is probably up there, no way Shell or ExxonMobil are in it. If we are talking the oil and gas giants that everyone knows about. Don't even ask about BP, they are dog water.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1vuk+1e59AJtK

Are we winning this football game? Because this practice sure does suck

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kvn+1e59AJtK

I checked Shell boards and their boards seem quiet compared to Exxon

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1iys+1e59AJtK

All of the US majors are pretty similar to us - if you really want to see a shizzshow check out the midsize operators

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @put+1e59AJtK

Not Shell. Head over to their message board if you think we have problems.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fvr+1e59AJtK

Oh it’s gotta be Exxon with all the winning that we’re doing. Have you seen how many times our energy cube has been featured on LinkedIn? Bunch of proud employees happy to work for Exxon. Speaking of which, it’s about time we got their CEO caught up to his peers’ compensation figures.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rpo+1e59AJtK

Shell

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nld+1e59AJtK

If you are talking with a great amount of U.S presence. I would have to go with Chevron

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lxv+1e59AJtK

Bp

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @art+1e59AJtK

Saudi Aramco, Petrochina or Rosneft

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lcb+1e59AJtK

Post a reply

: