Thread regarding ExxonMobil Corp. layoffs

Remember when XOM used to hire only the best?

How the times have changed...

by
| 3969 views | | 24 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1gg7T8gv

24 replies (most recent on top)

In the past salary in oil & gas was sufficiently high to attract talents despite all the drawback of the company. Nowadays you can work in start ups with much better work environment and similar salary.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @9lcg+1gg7T8gv

@1txq+1gg7T8gv all bmt chem plant is demotivating and we literally go there to collect paycheck and do what we told, bmt is notorious for poor management

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5iva+1gg7T8gv

Yes, used to hire the best. ExxonMobil went downhill when they lowered their standards and hired from the third tier schools like LSU, UT, TAMU, and BYU. Lowering the standards like that is what is sinking ExxonMobil.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4eur+1gg7T8gv

Judging from the chiefs, it must have been pre-merger

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2cbg+1gg7T8gv

You have to go back more than 20 years to get to the time when Exxon was hiring the best.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2huw+1gg7T8gv

We never hired the best. We hired people who were willing to become morally empty. Those who differed, left. We can confidently say that EM succeeds in employing absolutely the worst.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2wwc+1gg7T8gv

The excellent pay and benefits that were offered in the past being gone might have something to do with the trend you are seeing. Execs might think we aren't competing with FAANG for talent, but resignations say otherwise.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2uyq+1gg7T8gv

Nope. I used to work for that company during 8 years and I still do not remember that this company hired those kind of people, but I remember that EM changed the way to recognize people giving good job position to slackers, brownosers, backstabbers.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2yte+1gg7T8gv

How about managers that are RE and probably losing $100k plus a year in pension benefits due to rising interest rates but keep showing up to work. You’ve got to be some sort of lunatic for that to make any sense to you. Retire, it’s ok to stop working. Stop throwing away $.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ght+1gg7T8gv

Anyone below the age of 50 who continues to work at ExxonMobil, you have to ask, what is wrong with them?
Have they really lost touch with any kind of talent?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1gtw+1gg7T8gv

I keep seeing posts about middle management at Bmt chem o&a in different posts. Can u share more about what is happening and can you be specific which side you’re referring to? (O or A)? Is it a specific individual or the whole organization and what behaviors are you seeing? How does it compare to other sites?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1txq+1gg7T8gv

I think nearly everyone we've recruited into our department in the last 5 years has resigned in the last 2 years.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fak+1gg7T8gv

I think for the most part XOM still hires good people ( well that depends on who’s doing the interview’s) At Exxon Mobil O&A chemical plant in Beaumont it’s the mid management that turns the employees from good to disgruntled. I have said it before and I’ll say it again about this place the lack of family time and massive overtime due to unneeded side projects is ki----g this place.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1tnf+1gg7T8gv

On the upstream side I’m still pretty happy with my colleagues, first line sups, and a good portion of the managers. It’s at the “ops manager”, “director”, and VP level that there is an utter failure of leadership. Invisible to the grunts, no direction. An utter disgrace to the company I knew.
I’ve been around for a long time, and would like to think I’m qualified to make the NSI judgment above.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ybl+1gg7T8gv

Not really. I've seen Xom hire clowns in Annandale way before 2017.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1tkx+1gg7T8gv

Once the current execs are done, it'll be a wash.
Mining dividends is old hat. And they know it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dov+1gg7T8gv

Quite sad how the present group of exes run such a great company to the ground within the past 2 yrs. Worse thing is, either they r oblivious to what is happening on the ground right now or they r simply tone deaf. Those middle management r either helpless or dont dare to speak up for the fear for rocking the boat.

This is one of the worse managed company i have seen. Where's the "best" we talked about?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1rnx+1gg7T8gv

Well, Exxon may still want to hire the best but the irony is, does the best want to hire Exxon anymore or not is the real question.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1vjf+1gg7T8gv

EM still hires the best - the definition of "Best" has changed. LOL

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1mxe+1gg7T8gv

Remember when we didn’t outsource jobs to “low cost” locations

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1piz+1gg7T8gv

Remember when XOM used to hire?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1luz+1gg7T8gv

That was all just showbiz.
Commodity company now - as it always has been.
tax accountants and glory toads are the only essential hires.
the former are contracted out for the most part now.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1rqv+1gg7T8gv

I remember when EM attracted the best and were able to keep them. Times really have changed.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lkm+1gg7T8gv

I remember. I was one before I retired from EM in 2016. Times have changed, indeed. It is now a different company Thankfully I made it out alive at the age of 65

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gwd+1gg7T8gv

Post a reply

: