Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

Scoreboard doesn’t lie

For years we’ve been told the next initiative was going to turn this company around. First it was five-day RTO. Then it was AI. Then workforce reductions. Then another reorganization. Then a new headquarters campus. The strategy keeps changing, but the underlying problems don’t.

Meanwhile, employees have been saying the same thing the entire time - morale is declining, trust has been destroyed, experienced people are leaving, and the company is becoming a harder sell to younger talent. Instead of asking why so many people are saying the same thing, leadership keeps doubling down and acting like the employees are the problem.

At some point you have to stop blaming the workforce and start questioning the strategy. Success isn’t measured by how many people badge into an office or how many presence reports get generated. It’s measured by whether people want to work here, whether great candidates want to join, and whether the business is actually moving in the right direction.

The market eventually exposes every bad strategy. Employees vote with their feet. Candidates vote by accepting offers somewhere else. Investors vote every day the market is open. Those are the scorecards that ultimately matter… not another memo telling everyone the strategy is working.


by
| 1140 views | | 18 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kx0m8f7w

18 replies (most recent on top)

September will be another turn of the sc--ws. To do something else that makes people miserable under the façade of whatever they think will fix the company. That’s when everybody is supposed to be “living their designation“. They already rolled out an email about their new workplace reservation system. That’s supposed to be better than the last one bottom line is it’s another shake up that’s gonna make everybody miserable.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ek+1kx0m8f7w

The stock price doesn’t lie either.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cr+1kx0m8f7w

In April of 2023 when RTO was announced, it was the head fabricator that said we will never go back to the way it was. We’d be hybrid (outside of those roles that require 5 days in office). So from introduction of RTO we were told one plan and it shifted to another. The goal is for YOU to leave, either by choice, by force, or by burning you out until you do. Hybrid is reasonable. It provides work life balance. But that’s not the goal. The goal is for you to leave. It’s wrapped in corporate play of words called market based. Nothing is market based. It’s we are short revenue again and how many can we cut by end of year. Oh you were gonna cut 5 well now you need to cut 5 more.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c7+1kx0m8f7w

@aw Foster collaboration? What are you smoking? I have one meeting a week where I actually sit in a room with other people - my weekly team update, and even that is a call because we are not all in the same location. Is there a little benefit to seeing people in person occasionally? Sure why not but there is a zero reason a telecom company needs people to be in an office to sit on calls 5 days a week.

It’s been pointed out a million times. This is about getting rid of people and ego gratification with a teeny bit of collaboration as a side benefit.

If you’re too d-mb to get that you really should get a job better suited to your intellectual capacity like taste-testing bleach or something along those lines.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c4+1kx0m8f7w

How in the he-l do you people believe a damn word that comes out of leaderships mouth? Seriously, people on this board have a hard time dealing with reality! You all haven’t figured out that you shouldn’t believe a damn word that comes out of leaderships mouths? Here’s a tip for the d-mbfounded, only pay attention to their actions not their words, grow up people, it’s not hard! Leadership wants you all off the payroll asap, do you get it??HELLO, they want AI & foreign labor only!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ba+1kx0m8f7w

@aw " It has been implemented to foster collaboration and productivity."

And yet, it has done neither.

When the C-Suite initiated 5xRTO they did not assign us desks to insure we would be sitting close to those we need to collaborate with. They did not provide us enough parking to insure we could easily arrive at the location our co-workers would be. So, everyone comes into the office whenever they can get a parking space, they go sit at a desk that is available with no guarantee of it being close to those we need to work with, and we all get on TEAMs to collaborate. The additional hours good employees were willing to work beyond the 40 hour requirement is now assigned to the commute.

Further, every empirical study over the last five years has shown that a hybrid work schedule maximizes productivity.

So, we know the C-Suite lied to us about why we had to come into the office 5x8. It had nothing to do with collaboration and employee productivity. It is/was purely a head count reduction exercise, and even many of the officers have confirmed that to be true. Otherwise, implementation would have been completely different.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b8+1kx0m8f7w

A child running a lemonade stand could see these decisions were terrible. Costs too high? Build an expensive new lemonade stand! Try to make your sister so mad she quits! She would never kick over the lemonade cooler and make everything worse!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b4+1kx0m8f7w

@aw "foster collaboration" yet everyone still sits at their desks on teams calls wake up. This company doesnt give a damn about anyone.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b3+1kx0m8f7w

OP, just chill, laugh at these corporate clowns that run this circus and collect that pay check, pad that pension and collect the 401k match. It is easy street up in here, loving every day!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @az+1kx0m8f7w

@aw I’ll continue to show up at the office, put I. My headphones and watch Netflix at my desk all day long while doing the absolute bare minimum. You can have fun picking up the slack. Respect is a two way street and loyalty is dead per the CEO. Funny how that works. You’re the su---r!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ay+1kx0m8f7w

@aw Nope. I'll continue to waste time and resources while collecting full paychecks, and if it makes you all cranky - that's an added benefit. Enjoy picking up my slack for no added “market-based” compensation.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ax+1kx0m8f7w

RTO was never promoted as initiative to increase revenue or change the market. It has been implemented to foster collaboration and productivity. If not onboard, leave!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aw+1kx0m8f7w

In my role, I’m tasked to deliver improvements in metrics; whether that is sales, cost reduction or some other thing. That being said, I’ve seen many smart and talented people ki-l it, and deliver huge numbers, know what you get? Nothing. Barely even get a good job, maybe you get on some directors slide saying great job one month, but that’s about it. Yet, time and time again I see someone come up with some hair brained idea or some shiny object thing that somehow we know this isn’t going to work, we know it won’t ever actually get delivered; yet they get all the visibility, all the budget, etc. yet these things never actually materialize and can go on for years. Those are the people at the top. All smoke, no fire. I’m not surprised in the least. When things of actual value are not celebrated or rewarded, you sink and that explains the people the climb the ladder and the people we have at the top. This company is not going to make it another 150 years, we aren’t even going to make it another 20 if even that long.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @am+1kx0m8f7w

@a4

As long as bootlickers like you are on payroll, I 100% agree.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @af+1kx0m8f7w

The only thing "leadership" understands is that it's hard to hit a moving target. They zig and zag cover their own butts.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ac+1kx0m8f7w

@a4 sure but non-targeted attrition via RTO is not. Thats how you lose your best people first.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a8+1kx0m8f7w

T is bloated amd has too many employeee. Attrition is a good thing.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a4+1kx0m8f7w

Post a reply

: