Each asset will have to have the bottom 15% (5% of them will be PIP). HR doesn’t know how or what the process looks like. Gotta love Human Energy and The Chevron way right? Those messages are dead. It’s a dog eat dog world. Get the most out of your job and take care of your family. The Chevron of even 10 years ago is a but a distant memory. If you think high oil prices and great quarterly reports are gonna make a difference, you’re wrong
14 replies (most recent on top)
This is mostly just a way to force supervisors to be realistic. We at Chevron are famous for being "too nice" because we have no guts to make tough decisions. Supervisors were happy to fight over who to give the the top rating, then gave everyone else an "average" because giving anyone, no matter how horrible, a low rating was too scary. Plus, it reflected poorly on the supervisor to have a low-performing employee who required extra effort to improve and huge effort to terminate. I once gave a terrible expat a very low rating and recommended he be repatriated. Instead, he was whisked off to an even more plush location and his new boss yelled at me about the rating! So, with the new system we recognize that in a relative sense, we have a bottom 10% and we should either help them improve or replace them. Simple as that. Rank and yank. It improves the business over time. Of course, general managers and above will be ranking only supervisors so they will be ranking some bottom of the barrel and sorting them out. MW himself will have to choose his least favorites.
@ca that’s right. Many of us have. Let them figure it out on their own. That’s how we learned. Last year during the transition period, they told people if they help transition, they would be spared from layoffs. Guess where they are now.
@aq under the new ratings system, aren't there only 8 possible ratings?
@aq what are you talking about? No that’s not what they’re doing.
Plenty of people thought that and those are the ones shocked and crying when they are booted out.
@bf current advice is not to give that much notice. People think they are being considerate and helping their team. They will just offshore your job or not replace you. The latter seems to be most likely. It’ll be awkward for that time and you might as well have already left. They’ve shown they could care less about your expertise. No one uses the tons of documentation you leave behind. Let us know what you decide to do.
@OP It’s called Bottom 10er Round 35 which has been taking place since the early 2000’s. Nothing new here. Actually before offshoring there were still cuts to the Work Force in the 90’s as well. Just to keep the troops aligned with the business. CEO’s Derr and O’Reily were ruthless as well. But you young whippersnappers wouldn’t know that would you. Unless your parents worked at Chevron. Slackers were still part of the process and Brown Nosing! Cheers!!!
I've already stopped sharing anything. "Oh, you need to be more of a team player." No, give me some assurances I'm not going to be shoved out the door and I'll think about it for a nanosecond. Otherwise you can bring me on as a consultant six months later at twice my current rate. Or you can eat sh*t, I really don't care.
@bf
This is a good question. During mass layoffs, one doesn’t have a chance or time to disclose intentions to leave… as such, no individual need be burdened with the “I’m leaving my (soon to be ex) group,manager,coworkers out to dry…”
Robin Williams tells us that it’s not our fault… and then Matt Damon gets shown by MarkyMark that it was…
If you give 6 months+ notice of retiring, are you automatically put in the bottom bucket? Will they let you go prior to your planned retirement date ?
“ "Forced" ranking just means no two employees can have the same ranking. No two employees are the same, so it makes sense we each get a unique ranking.”
You are quite dense if you think thats the main impact to employees. In the context that we are discussing, forced ranking means labelling a certain percentage of the population as “low performers” and then punishing them in some way (PIP, layoffs, lower raise/bonus)
"Forced" ranking just means no two employees can have the same ranking. No two employees are the same, so it makes sense we each get a unique ranking.
@a9 Agree 100%
It is truly astounding that MW and the ELT are so incompetent and unimaginative that they are relying once again on tired and ineffective ideas regurgitated by useless consultants. Not one independent, visionary fibre in any of these dinosaurs. I hope there will be some accountability for or at a minimum public denouncement of MW’s highly destructive actions. He has ruined what used to be a great company. Way to go Mickey! That’s the piece of cr-p legacy that you are leaving in this world.
Chevron is resurrecting the corpse of Jack Welch while other corporations have long abandoned his ideas for unfairly penalizing good employees on high-performing teams and discouraging peer collaboration. MW is a very backwards leader and the cadre of Boomers who run Chevron need to go.
Welcome to the real world ….