Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

Contractors converted to employees

A few folks I know that are contractors were told they can be converted to T employees. Some are in their 50s & 60s. How can this be in light of layoffs? This is supposedly coming from Legg.

by
| 1742 views | | 14 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1lX23uv8

14 replies (most recent on top)

too many mouths to feed and no one is safe

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2bjv+1lX23uv8

Most contractors don’t want to be employees.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1mhd+1lX23uv8

And just when we thought we had seen it all!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bug+1lX23uv8

Saw some folks get promoted to level 3 and 4s recently even though we were told there’s a freeze on hiring and promotions. we were also told that with the layoffs, we would be cutting responsibilities, but as expected, they dumped more work and responsibilities on my team. Now we find out we’re going to have to start working more hours and have to be available 24/7. Add to it that min 5% increase we were told we were getting only turned out to be 3%. Yeah, that hours thing, nope nope nope. I plan on resigning soon and I’m sure others on the team will pull the retirement cord.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fyk+1lX23uv8

Same ole good ole boy system that ATT is famous for!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1sjl+1lX23uv8

This has always been one of the core problems at T that has caused things to be the way they are now.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xqx+1lX23uv8

Sometimes the Brother or Sister-in-law needs benefits

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jwf+1lX23uv8

Very common and unfortunate. We keep being back the same turds that milked the system for years. I am always glad when the so called best ones leave. It is my hope they vanish. The big wheel will keep on turning without bringing back dead weight.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sol+1lX23uv8

Everyone I know that's gotten laid-off has come back as a contractor. Its very common.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sfr+1lX23uv8

What difference does it make at this point, they'll be laid off within the next 3-5 years anyway!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ory+1lX23uv8

Can they do that?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yhd+1lX23uv8

They’re not downsizing. They’re just cutting people that don’t kids enough a-s

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @eas+1lX23uv8

Underhanded!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @oai+1lX23uv8

This makes no since in a downsizing environment.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qhv+1lX23uv8

Post a reply

: