Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

I'm gonna use a dirty word: "Union". But hear me out.

Listening to the news around the SAG-AFTRA demands and things like the company that replaced it's customer service with AI chatbots (Dukaan) has me thinking about the pending encroachment of AI.
I think it is reasonable to think that most of our jobs are or will be replaceable by AI within 5 years. This includes everything from our customer service people to our exalted developers, DBAs, and architects.
And you know, the charlie crew will kick every one of us to the curb for an extra 5 cents on the bottom line.
Some of you reading this are saying "oh that won't happen to me, I'm too good/too important/too hard a worker/my job is too complex...Honestly if you think you are safe, you haven't been paying attention.

So what do we do?
Hope?
Work harder?
Go someplace else?
None of these are real solutions.

Is a union the solution? I don't know. I live in a right to work state the unions here are effectively toothless. But I think something needs to be done. We are watching ourselves be overtaken by forced obsolescence. Even if we unionize now it may already be too late.

you say "unions are corrupt" - sure sometimes they are, but sometimes they are good people working with our best interest at heart.

you say "unions are socialist/communist/etc" - We can see the end of our careers mapped out by capitalism and we're not willing to to protect ourselves due to ideology?

you say "I don't want to float people who don't work as hard as I do"- you are happy to float charlie and the board who don't work as hard as you do. How about floating the folks around you instead?

you say "I don't want to spend my money on union dues" - well, if we got appropriate raises every so often, that might not hurt so much.

Look, I don't know if this is the solution or if there even is a solution, but to quote the Simpsons, "We've tried nothing and it isn't working"

by
| 1361 views | | 12 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1nFnY3Iz

12 replies (most recent on top)

Yes. We should fall behind our competitors to protect jobs. Companies that don't advance will fail. If you have a job that is likely to become obsolete start retraining now.

It isn't that hard and unions are not the solution.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2euo+1nFnY3Iz

Your employer belongs to multiple trade groups and donates to politicians and PACs that work in their interest.

A union would work in your interest.

Have there been issues? Oh, yeah.

But you can either create a union without those issues or continue to watch while the C level exec's and board and Wall Street get richer off your hard work.

Funny how the corporate shills never mention that the bank belongs to trade groups fighting for the shareholders but not you.

The country was stronger when there was higher union membership, unions and the GI bill built the middle class.

And since those "good old days", your pay has stayed pretty flat while the CEO class went from making 40 times your earnings to making over 400 times your earnings.

The system is rigged against you, unions help level the field.

Good luck all, don't let the rich people scare you into being poor.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1pbm+1nFnY3Iz

“HA HA HA GTFO”

That’s the response you will get at every other interview you ever go to when they see on your resume you were part of a white collar union

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ogh+1nFnY3Iz

If you look at some of the most effective unions going, look at the US pilots' unions. Most of the complaints of bad unions seem to be for jobs that are fairly low skill. Pilots are among the highest skill, highest paid jobs and their unions seem to actually get pretty decent results. I think it's at least possible that a union for highly skilled labor would be effective.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1etp+1nFnY3Iz

Everybody's ideal America is different. Whom gives a F about what some CEO's make? Musk, Gates, Buffet, etc all climbed by hard work, dead bodies, soul corrosion and talent. You want their lives? At least a meritocracy vs Union mediocrity. The government is pushing 'social/economic' ideology (ESG/DEI) and unions, yet they operate at a deficit. Private companies can't. In my experience Unions bring everyone to the lowest common denominator. BTW corporations don't pay taxes, people do.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fbt+1nFnY3Iz

@aaa actually:

Musk was born to wealthy parents and never had to work hard to get ahead in life.

Bill Gates' father was a prominent lawyer who served on multiple boards.

Jeff Bezos is a better example since he came from a much tougher situation but worked himself into Princeton and then a hedge fund for a few years before 30-year-old Bezos and his wife both quit to start their online business.

Buffett is awesome. Nobody can fault the world's greatest living investor who has given away most of his wealth and is still one of the wealthiest people on the planet.

Most of them come from a few universities where their legacy status/connections got them set up.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @oyc+1nFnY3Iz

@sho+1nFnY3Iz

Most super wealthy people didn't inherit their money. Musk? Gates? Buffet? Bezos? We could go on all day, but this 'old money' thing is largely a myth in recent times. Death taxes and the fact that no one can string together very many generations before an id--t comes along makes sure of it in all but the rarest of cases.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aaa+1nFnY3Iz

First, AI is only replacing stupid jobs for the most part. If you really think WF is willing to pony up the cash that a real AI solution will require for handling in-depth thought work, LMFAO.

Second, As pro-union as I am (I'm in tech and want tech to be union) I don't believe that unions will have the power to stop the march of AI. They can negotiate better human wages and conditions for remaining jobs but it's a losing battle otherwise.

Finally, AI will work great until it doesn't. Then it will require humans to troubleshoot, repair, test, etc...

Upskill or get replaced. Just like factory workers.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @uxf+1nFnY3Iz

Unions are the weakest strength duct tape for the real big problem: greed

Two big examples:

Large corporations must protect excess profitability at all costs. If they profit $25b one year and the next it is $24b, oh no. Loss! Stock price drop! Confidence gone.

The few wealthy and powerful individuals/families (about 1,500 citizens) must continue to grow their inherited wealth. There is no personal accountability to invest back into their communities, to demonstrate their belief in our country with limited risk to their status.

Solution?

Profit should be thought of as a reward when the socio-economic needs of a society have been met. We don't have that today, things are out of balance. The gov't must enforce/raise corporate tax rates and set additional tax rates for the wealthy.

As regular individuals and the media, we should not glorify money/power as if it represents the ideal America.

The ideal America is a fair one, where all social and economic classes of people can be free to move around and intersect comfortably. Capitalism w/ some guardrails is not socialism, it is merely a way to help the country maintain a healthy temperature for all.

Most people want this, yet many will read this and think someone will beat down their door and take something away that they earned. That thinking is a trap setup by our current situation.

No politician in their right mind is getting elected thinking like this. That is too bad.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sho+1nFnY3Iz

And good luck finding a job at another bank that’s not unionized. I’m not a wf lifer, so that’s important to me. If the other bank knows wf is unionized, they will find a reason not to hire you. They (and other large companies) perceive it to be a disease.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @oez+1nFnY3Iz

AI is the current boogeyman. It will not replace most jobs in 5 years. The current crop of AI is more of a prototype to show what it could eventually do.

But it won't be solid enough to rely on autonomously for many, many years. It'll be a phased approach for jobs that AI can do better. Instead of replacing 10 people, maybe half will be replaced by AI while the remaining people oversee what they AI is actually doing, and correct and document the AI's mistakes.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aks+1nFnY3Iz

The problem with unions is that if competing companies are not unionized and bearing those costs they can always beat us on price. Unionizing the buggy whip makers wouldn't have saved the industry or any individual company in it. There's a lot of jobs humans don't need to be doing, we'll have to shift to doing other things.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nec+1nFnY3Iz

Post a reply

: