Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

ULP District 3

Looks like maybe general counsel has signed off on the charge.

https://www.nlrb.gov/case/10-CA-347889

by
| 1175 views | | 9 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1uoy7QE9

9 replies (most recent on top)

It just means they acknowledged receipt. Doesn't really mean anything more than that.

It'll be a while before anything definitive comes from the NLRB.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fbx+1uoy7QE9

Punitive damages would be determined after the charges are ruled to be valid.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jbp+1uoy7QE9

regarding back pay

That would be part of any ruling against the company after a complaint and hearing. It would not be any time soon. The case against CNN dr-g out for years.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sme+1uoy7QE9

Didn't notice the AFL-CIO being on the original charge, so maybe that's what the NLRB entered was another signed charge inlcuding the AFL-CIO? The NLRB can't file charges, so looks like this is an update to the original charge, or just a notice of assignment/charge received? The next actionable step is a complaint/notice of hearing, which the NLRB would file on the charge if they found merit.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @obf+1uoy7QE9

I have read the NLRB employers requirements for UFP strikes but could not find anything regarding back pay, may have missed it (not a lawyer). Does anyone know where this information can be found? If pay back is required, does it pay out immediately or after an agreement has been ratified?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @iys+1uoy7QE9

pdk+
It may mean he is about to earn his keep.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jkn+1uoy7QE9

Back pay coming?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wev+1uoy7QE9

OooooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhNoooooooooooooooooooo¡!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wof+1uoy7QE9

So what does this mean? I’m not a lawyer.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pdk+1uoy7QE9

Post a reply

: