Thread regarding Qualcomm Inc. layoffs

What qualcomm needs to do is dump the useless people

It doesnt take a rocket scientist to realize that splitting the Q is a bad idea. We just need to get rid of the useless people who work here. From what it looks like. Maybe 3 out of 10 people actually do their job right. We need to become more edficient. The competition has already caught up and its not only us anymore. There needs to be a purge so we can get rid of the leeches. Or we will be eating the competitors dirt soon.

by
| 2728 views | | 25 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+EYSSj7A

25 replies (most recent on top)

Fast growth always gets back at you.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4law+EYSSj7A

" why did they go overboard and hire so many. "

That's easy to answer. Each eng hired by the corrupt management, as a favor, had a spouse, other family members that they needed to bring in. Even today I see spouses being hired, for the same group? Numbers rack up really fast with folks being hired based on mostly recommendation from some engr and some namesake interview.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4hqe+EYSSj7A

from what i saw, don't agree with a few of the people that got let go, and who got to stay. getting out of there asap. no future there. some of the indians are decent engineers, but wtf why did they go overboard and hire so many.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4ubo+EYSSj7A

3rdg: I sort of disagree. With the right qualified folks at the director+ level would have resulted in making better decisions and also with better quality engineers (interested in climbing ladder the right way rather then sucking up) the work env would not be so toxic.

When Nokia mobile division was going through turbulence (spiral death), helpless employees were a lot more together and going to work was not that of a horrible feeling as it is here.

Q needs to get rid of the old boys clubs along with their buddies that were hired based on connections alone. They need to look at Quic seriously. There are some pretty bad reviews about the management in Quic LA (director + level) on glassdoor as well.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3fwa+EYSSj7A

I agree with the corruption and ghetto culture arguments, but even if this was not happening Q would still be in trouble because it's an expensivee one trick crapdragon pony in a highly commodity market.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3rdg+EYSSj7A

Of course they are... Join company, make it your hub, bring in folks circumventing the hiring process in place, weaken the company with the corrupt ghetto culture...

Then when ship is sinking, look for another ship to embark and find and exploit loop holes in the hiring process and/or lower the standard of the hiring process to bring in low quality folks into the new hub and repeat...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2abw+EYSSj7A

The top is corrupt, and does not care

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2tww+EYSSj7A

" This is correct, our management capabilities are poor at best ".

Saying poor is just an understatement. Corrupt is more like it. From what i have seen they have followed unfair policies for hiring people and now that things are not working out, they choose to move to another ship where they can breed this same unfair ways of hiring and pulling in their "buddies" ..

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bxf+EYSSj7A

it starts at the top. Why have a useless chairman of the board, when the board and senior management does not do anything.

Why not just get rid of every 4th VP and director by random process and then see where it leaves the company?

Trim the pay of everyone at director or above by 50% and see who stays.

Rats usually flee a sinking ship fast.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1nzd+EYSSj7A

This is correct, our management capabilities are poor at best

" it is QCOM cultural and the engineer management teams who steer the floating boat to sink,".

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xyk+EYSSj7A

" it is QCOM cultural and the engineer management teams who steer the floating boat to sink,".

That is so true. These management, mostly directors with questionable management skills, after doing a lousy job are now jumping ship. Look at Quic! I hear some are and have moved to Google and are spreading/continuing on this bad culture and their usual ugly politics. Despite the great impartial hiring process to gate these kind of bad culture from percolating into Google, I am surprised how these folks are making it in...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xzy+EYSSj7A

Useful or useless is defined by head of the cluster.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1vyl+EYSSj7A

No matter how hard one will try, QCOM is heading south and will eventually fail. It is not a few of useless people, it is QCOM cultural and the engineer management teams who steer the floating boat to sink, they also transfer the best engineers into the useless engineers if stay long.

Short the QCOM with tremendous confidence at around $70s and still hold the short positions, much better reward compare to daily hard working at Q and to the tiny RSUs received each year. Don't trust your managers and HRs, trust what your heart tells you!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ini+EYSSj7A

The company is in a death spiral. Its been in one for years (it just wasn't apparent to most, but it was to people who have been through this before), you just have to know what to look for to realize it. By the time its obvious to most people, its too late. And I'm not talking about the stock price, thats just one thing. Its marked by extreme amounts of internal politics, low productivity due to having to deal with internal corporate bloat, indecisiveness and inability to motivate people, having the company become its own enemy (in terms of just getting things done), bad people getting ahead through their own politics, and good people leaving because its just not worth dealing with things anymore. In later stages it manifests as reorganizations, restructurings, layoffs and finally a buy out. If management can motivate people, reduce corporate bloat, discover meaningful business opportunities to diversify the company, and create good will then things will turn around. Absent that, expect more spiraling down. Now that you have been warned, the burden is on you to get off your ass and contribute to change things or get up and go. Put up or shut up. If you don't do anything, its likely that you are just part of the problem.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1aja+EYSSj7A

I think people should think before they speak. There are still plenty of people out there without jobs in a very tough job market during a difficult time of year. That being said, I agree that there are several people in high ranking positions that need to move on. Depressing to see senior engineers spending time in silly mail list discussions for most of the day.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ooe+EYSSj7A

@EYSSj7A-1hgl: You are really traumatized by your chinese director and lead. Please - go and see a doctor.

Don't be surprised that your doctors tell you that they never existed, you really need help.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1pwj+EYSSj7A

Get rid of ind ians, musli ms

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zol+EYSSj7A

Just out of curiosity.... Were any managers, Directors or VPs actually laid off--aside from the few who actually voluntarily bailed for jobs in Silicon Valley?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wew+EYSSj7A

@bjy. I agree. IMO, at this point it is hard to separate the efficient/good employees from the horrible usless ones. Most of the smart contributing engineers have left or are too busy planning to leave. So good ones have sortof given up and hard to tell based on their recent contribution in this low morale environment.

Would be iteresting to see how management decides who to let go... My guess is they will most likely let a lot of good smart engineers go.

One thing for sure though letting most director+ guys go is a very good bet. Specially the ones who have been here for a long time. There are way too many of them that are doing redundant work (ex in Quic) trying to fake their importance and need.

Also letting go of some Principal eng that do not really do much technical work would be a good bet. There are a bunch that cant code at all.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @urc+EYSSj7A

Every body's beautiful in their own way...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @egp+EYSSj7A

in some groups, yes. we got rid of all the useless idiots. if you didn't, than your manager needs to go

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hra+EYSSj7A

Get rid of all useless directors and hr

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hvh+EYSSj7A

Lol, is there anyone who seriously thinks the right people were laid off or pip'd?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sia+EYSSj7A

It can't be done, too many of the useless people have moved into position of management, even executive positions where they protect their subordinate useless people. There is no way to vet and filter employees or even structure the reporting chain where it would be possible.

I've seen good people pushed aside to be laid off or PIP'd so a pet employee can take over and struggle to the determent of the product, and guess what? That struggling employee doing a half-arsed job is counted as a "key employee" because he makes the responsibility seem more difficult than it is. Everyone who is inside the meds sees it, but we are helpless. What can be done? Can't talk to your manager, director or VP, they are either as powerless as you or they are the problem. HR is on the side of the worthless, and the few good executives that once had my respect have given up. Nothing left to do but watch the water rise and make sure you have your life vest on.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bjy+EYSSj7A

Did you not hear about the layoffs?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @upw+EYSSj7A

Post a reply

: