Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

Intel's two front war. Why trying to be a "jack of all trades" is resulting in being a "master of none"

Intel's biggest problem right now is lack of focus. One one had, Intel started listening to wall street ANALYSTS questioning intels' x86 growth in PC/Servers, which lead into a clusterfuk "diversification" into other areas, it knows nothing about such as computer security (McAfee)...While that itself didn't do that much financial damage and defocus intel too much ( since relatively speaking, McAfee wasn't a significant shift in Intel's business), Intel has steadily doubled down on stupid and invested much more time and money into other areas it has no leadership abilities, know technical prowess, and no good leaders at the helm to steer the ship in those new unchartered territories. The first disasters are it's mobile ventures, then it's the IOT ventures, and now it will be automotive and AI...

Intel management only seems to care about appeasing wall street analysts and are trying to falsely claim they have the technical prowess walk into any chip business (other than x86) and immediately be a disruptor to the markets, grabbing market share immediately off the bat from seasoned competitors heavily trenched into those businesses, spending billions in sectors it has yet to turn any profit in.

Meanwhile, as it defocuses on x86 to venture off into these "growth businesses" unsuccessfully, it lets "old intel's" bread and butter businesses languish and fall behind...Hence, how AMD is now able to be competitive with Intel's Crappy Lake, that isn't really innovative or earth shattering.

Getting fat and not improving the core business, getting defocused and making stupid decisions into other areas it has no business being in, and accomplishing nothing in the process....The biggest accomplishment at Intel is probably from Intel HR: a successful implementation of "URM"....Unfortunately, URM does not drive profits.

by
| 940 views | | 4 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+M2c7joG

4 replies (most recent on top)

Can confirm.

Intel strategy is a joke.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @auq+M2c7joG

Intel and BK is the joke conversation in many a board roam and executive discussion.

A decade ago intel was feared but after multiple failures and bungled execution competition still watch intel but no longer fear it much. More often than not laugh at the pomp of ppt promises.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dvl+M2c7joG

At one time, Intel really could move markets. After so many failures in recent years, however, the shine is off and no one really believes Intel when they jump into something new. Intel liked to make markets and then get out and have others just build products on their CPUs (e.g. ATCA was a good one, in honor of this week's MWC). Traditional customers are VERY wary of non-CCG or DCG products or one-offs, so Intel is courting new customer types that haven't been burned before. But after another set of failed ventures, the entire customer base will slowwwwly dry up.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @uae+M2c7joG

Was thinking about this myself some time ago, 100% agree with OP, you hit the nail right on the head.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zgi+M2c7joG

Post a reply

: