Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

Why hasn't Intel fired all the underperformers?

Waiting for investor day announcement again?

We'll find out an hour before!

by
| 1969 views | | 12 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+MJ4dXXw

12 replies (most recent on top)

They did get rid of all the deadwood, watch intel soar the next few years.

It will be huge growth with compelling new products on mutiple fronts.

Massive output from and cost efficiencies from 10nm, 14nm and 22nm.

All is good now the deadwood is gone and the performers can shine. All starts with the coming quarterly announcements.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3cks+MJ4dXXw

Many URMs were framed and fired during the ACT by managers who do not even have a degree!!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3ocy+MJ4dXXw

@OP, Nope, BK and his cronies are still there.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2pbm+MJ4dXXw

Every female is considered an URM 😊 😊 😊, just a FYI !!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1txc+MJ4dXXw

FALSE ✋ 😐 😐 @1srp

It is NOT true that URM are untouchable.

In fact, there were many URMs that were laidoff last year due to ACT.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1shm+MJ4dXXw

Intel has to fire only two under performers BK and Stacey Smith. After that no need to fire anyone. Intel will do much better.

-- Intel employee who left in 2012

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kzk+MJ4dXXw

The under performers are in charge. They arent likely to fire themselves

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1gqv+MJ4dXXw

1srp, lay off those who spend too much time to solve technical problems but not enough time to make themselves visible.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ucy+MJ4dXXw

URM is untouchable. So tell me, how do you fire low performers?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1srp+MJ4dXXw

BK and other TMG given walking papers yet?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1axv+MJ4dXXw

A few have been notified that their job will end in August - to transfer into another job or prepare to leave.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ycc+MJ4dXXw

More ACTs are sure in the second half of the year and next 😉

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ygw+MJ4dXXw

Post a reply

: