#reorg

Posts mentioning hashtag #reorg

Below are all the posts — topics as well as replies — that mention the hashtag #reorg.

Mention #reorg in your post to continue the discussion!

ConocoPhillips to slash workforce by up to 25% amid cost pressures

ConocoPhillips is implementing a reorganization, reducing its workforce by 20-25% to cut costs amid declining oil prices and rising expenses, with most layoffs occurring before yearend.
by Conglin Xu

Key Highlights
(1) ConocoPhillips plans to cut 2,600-3,250 jobs due to cost pressures, primarily before end-2025.

(2) The energy company aims to complete its reorganization and announce new leadership by mid-September, with full implementation by 2026.

(3) Similar layoffs are occurring industry-wide, with Chevron, BP, and SLB also reducing headcounts.

US oil and gas producer ConocoPhillips will cut between 20% and 25% of its workforce as part of a sweeping reorganization aimed at cutting costs and improving competitiveness, the company confirmed on Sep.3.

The Houston-based energy firm employs about 13,000 people worldwide, meaning between 2,600 and 3,250 jobs will be affected. Most of the reductions will occur before yearend, with the new corporate structure and leadership team to be announced in mid-September. The broader reorganization is expected to be completed by 2026.

The move comes amid weaker oil prices and rising costs that have squeezed profits across the industry. ConocoPhillips’ second-quarter net income fell to $2 billion, the lowest since early 2021 during the COVID-19 downturn. Chief executive officer Ryan Lance said costs have climbed by about $2/bbl in recent years, with controllable expenses rising to $13/bbl in 2024 from $11/bbl in 2021, eroding competitiveness.

In an internal video, Lance noted that as the company optimizes its organization and take work out of the system, fewer roles will be needed.

Oil, gas company layoffs
Other oil majors have also announced significant layoffs this year. Chevronsaid in February it would cut up to 20% of its staff, bp plc plans to reduce its workforce by more than 7,000 positions, and oilfield services giant SLB is trimming jobs as well.

In August, ConocoPhillips announced it expects to achieve more than $1 billion in cost cuts and margin improvements by the end of 2026, in addition to $1 billion in synergies it plans to achieve from its acquisition of Marathon Oil in 2024.

https://www.ogj.com/general-interest/personnel-moves-promotions/news/


Why does this take so long?

A similar sized company with a Portland footprint just conducted layoffs and a reorg. It was completed in 1 day. Why does it take Nike 5 months to cut a few hundred jobs and role out a new org structure and strategy that’s been known at the VP level since the beginning of the year?


RIP FOP!

Speaking of d-mb acronyms: What does “fields of play” mean anyway?

Tennis and basketball are played on a court. Running happens on a trail or track. Even in soccer (football) the playing area is more commonly referred to as a ‘pitch.’

This is the kind of inane rebranding that resulted in losing our focus and did zero to stem the loss of market share.

I applaud the move back to aligning with Sport. We should NEVER have left the category offense.

Once this is over hopefully this will allow us to all row in the same direction. And hope that it’s not too late.


Sep_Draft

Right-sizing is not about cutting back. It’s not about loss. It’s about clarity, focus, and positioning ourselves for the future. Think of it as shaping a high-performance team where every role, every resource, every process is aligned with where we want to go.

We are at a point in our journey where the opportunities ahead are huge, but so are the challenges. The market is evolving, customer expectations are shifting, and innovation is relentless. To rise to this, we cannot afford to be carrying structures, systems, or habits that hold us back. Right-sizing is how we unlock agility, speed, and strength.

This is about creating an organisation that is fit for tomorrow, not just comfortable with yesterday. It’s about ensuring that every person here is in the right place, with the right tools, doing the right work that adds the most value. When we do this, we don’t just survive change—we drive it.

And here’s the inspiring part: right-sizing is not about reducing what we are; it’s about amplifying who we can be. It’s about freeing up energy, capital, and creativity to invest in growth, innovation, and the things that really matter to our customers and our future.

Together, we will become leaner, sharper, and more resilient. Together, we will build an organisation that is not only successful but significant.

So let us embrace right-sizing as a catalyst—not for less, but for more. More clarity. More opportunity. More impact. More future.

Because this is not the end of something—it is the beginning of our next level. And we are going there together.

Thank you.


Dang it!

I missed the layoff bus yesterday morning again! Didn't hear anything in COO Control. I thought they'd be targeting removal of all remote within Control by Q4 but there's still a lot left it appears. I've had four different bosses in the last 2 years after multiple reorgs. Did they forget about me? 😬 My new boss doesn't know much but speculates they might even keep me to Q1. 🤔 True or false?


Start the bets

How many teams will change name and acronyms? Which seems to be the most critical part of any re-org.
We are all good as long as the function has a new name.


this style of keeping everyone on their toes waiting, especially through Labor Day weekend of all times, is really cruel

when will these never ending layoffs and re-orgs just stop. It feels extremely unnerving and unsafe, even as a high performer, to feel like you could be on the chopping block constantly over the past few years at Nike.


A Toast To ELT

Since we've Reimagined the values on which this firm stands, let's get rid of the Toast to Ted and Toast ELT:

You've truly discovered the secret inGREEDient to success.

The revolutionary way in which you've enriched yourselves and your friends while subcontracting to outside consultants and ChatGPT "deliver" on your work is quite innovative to the wealth management industry. Who needs partners to share the work when you and your homies can grab a greater share of the wealth while getting someone else to do that pesky work, right?!

May you never have to hear associates whine about job security, pay reductions or their 4th reorg in 3 years that did nothing to improve operating efficiency while enjoying the buzz of your buzzwords and $10k bottles of wine.

Cheers!


How Accenture CEO Julie Sweet communicated a major restructuring to 770,000 employees across 120 countries without ever sending a memo

The self-promotion "Sweet Julie" PR tour continues. "Look, I'm so awesome according to me" (she really does think she is). She claims and thinks that she cares so much about people and "human connections".

Is she trying to save her job and is applying for the next one?

How Accenture CEO Julie Sweet communicated a major restructuring to 770,000 employees across 120 countries without ever sending a memo

https://fortune.com/2025/09/01/accenture-julie-sweet-restructuring-ai-memo-video-message-titans-podcast/

“Reading it on a piece of paper would not have conveyed the why in the same way as hearing it—hearing the excitement in my voice, understanding the passion we have for why we’re changing,” Sweet said in a recent interview

Sweet’s communication strategy reflects the scale of challenge she faces as head of Accenture, the world’s largest consulting firm by revenue. The Dublin-based company generated $64.9 billion in fiscal 2024 and serves more than 9,000 clients, providing services spanning strategy consulting, cloud migration, data analytics, artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and more. With hundreds of thousands employees spread across more than 120 countries, Accenture helps organizations reinvent themselves in the digital age, making it both a beneficiary of and participant in the AI-driven transformation sweeping global businesses.

Sweet herself represents an unconventional path to corporate leadership. Since becoming CEO in September 2019, she’s been the first woman to lead Accenture and the first CEO in the company’s history who didn’t start there straight out of college. Her background as a high-powered corporate lawyer—she spent 17 years at the prestigious firm Cravath, Swaine & Moore, making partner within eight years—gave her an outsider’s perspective when she joined Accenture as general counsel in 2010. Under her leadership, the company’s revenue has grown more than 50%, and she’s been recognized as one of Fortune‘s Most Powerful People in Business.

The restructuring Sweet announced represents what she describes as reversing “five decades of how we’re working.” The move brings together previously siloed business units to better serve clients seeking comprehensive digital transformation, aligning Accenture’s organizational structure with its strategy to be “the reinvention partner of choice” for businesses navigating rapid technological change.

At the heart of Sweet’s strategy was recognition that this transformation had to be both decisive and deeply human. The restructure wasn’t a cost-cutting exercise, though Sweet acknowledges it inevitably uncovered efficiencies and duplications. Instead, the move was driven by client needs and Accenture’s ambition to deliver integrated solutions combining industry knowledge, technical expertise, data, AI, and functional capabilities as a single offering.

“In order to capture the opportunity with AI, you really have to be willing to rewire your company,” Sweet said, reflecting broader advice she gives to Fortune 500 CEOs. “Many times, when clients are saying, we’re not getting a lot out of AI, it’s because they’re trying to apply it to how they operate today.”

Sweet’s approach to managing the change went beyond just the medium of communication. She solicited feedback and critiques from her leadership team, refining her message through multiple iterations to ensure it resonated at every level. “I try to have no ego on communication, because it’s so important that we’re really clear,” she said, noting all her direct reports work with speech coaches to hone their communication skills.

The transformation also demanded what Sweet calls a balance of “art and science”—using metrics and benchmarks from Accenture’s transformation GPS database to provide the analytical foundation, while applying empathy and cultural understanding to ensure the human element wasn’t lost. Ultimately, Sweet’s leadership through this restructuring has become a case study in navigating sweeping organizational change in an era when traditional corporate communication methods may no longer suffice.


VCF PSO....

..so when exactly would the plug be pulled for the rest of this division, as we all know there is going to be a shift to partners?
Some say end October/Start of November? What are you hearing?


Early Exit and Termination for Penny?

Since this Enterprise Reimagine was so bad, who will take responsibility? There are loads of complaint from field and survivors, who should take responsibility?

Also hearing that this is the master plan that Chubak wants Penny to do ER so that he can be managing partner faster. Nobody wants to wait 5 years to see Penny retire and then taking over.

I am sickened to my stomach to see this organization go backwards in all of the values they believe in + the momentum the firm had around new business/technology/products. We lost so many unicorns and institutional knowledge that we will never get back.


This will be the bestest reorg there ever was

It’s not going to be like the last dozen reorgs over the years that reduced the workforce but accomplished absolutely nothing else. No, sir. This one is going to make real changes! Unlike all the others, we’ll finally see real improvements in results, not just a temporary bump because of layoffs. I’m telling you, this is it!


SH&T show

S&T reorg has been an absolute debacle. Implementation team clearly didn't involve enough people actually executing the work for these workflows to make any sense and then point their fingers at other orgs when there is a question of who does what. At least they all got their promotions though. What a fu--ing joke.


Frustration with the reorg silence

The pending reorg is draining the company. There’s no information and no transparency about what’s coming next. At the same time, leadership keeps asking for more and more work without providing org clarity. Do they realize how unreasonable it feels to demand so much while sharing so little?


Les

When will LC be fired? He's non existent and IT is a complete disaster after the re-org. Morale in the toilet and there was no plan at all for what happened after the cut 50% or more of US staff. I've heard Engine is a disaster as well. Also wonder if MW will ever show his face again to employees. Only way to hear from him is to see him talk to Wall Street Sc-m on TV.


Know Your Rights

Know Your Rights in a Demotion / Reorganization (Missouri Employees)

There’s a lot of rumor right now about upcoming demotions being used as a cost-cutting tactic. Some of you may be wondering: If I’m offered a big downgrade and I refuse it, am I considered “fired” or “quit”?

The truth: It depends how the company handles it, and how severe the changes are. Missouri courts have looked at this exact issue many times. Here are some important cases:

Key Missouri Cases
• Kimble v. Division of Employment Security (2013)
An IT manager’s role was eliminated; he was offered a car sales position. He refused. The court said this counted as a voluntary quit without good cause because he didn’t try to preserve his job and the pay loss was “speculative.” Result: No unemployment benefits.

Takeaway: If you refuse a different role, the state may treat it as a resignation unless the demotion is clearly unreasonable.

•   Mickles v. Maxi Beauty Supply (2019)

A manager was demoted by text to a clerk position. She quit. The court said she had good cause to quit—the demotion was unfair and handled poorly. She qualified for unemployment benefits.

Takeaway: How the employer handles the demotion (fair process vs. unfair surprise) matters.
• Sokol v. Labor & Indus. Relations Comm’n (1997)
Employer changed contract terms; worker refused to accept. The court said this was a discharge, not a resignation.

Takeaway: If the company outright says “You’re done if you don’t accept these changes,” that’s a termination.

• Von Hoffman Press v. Industrial Comm’n (1972)
Worker declined being forced into full-time after working part-time. Employer fired her. Court ruled this was a discharge.

Takeaway: If they change the deal and then end your job, that’s not a voluntary quit.

• Armco Steel Corp. v. Labor & Indus. Relations Comm’n (1977)
Worker declined a transfer with a 44% pay cut. Court found she had good cause to refuse and qualified for unemployment.

Takeaway: Major pay cuts are recognized as good cause to decline.

What this means for you

  1. If you accept the demotion → You remain employed, but you may have little legal recourse later.
  2. If you refuse → It matters whether:
    • The company terminates you (that’s a discharge).
    • Or they frame it as you “resigned” (that’s voluntary leaving).
  3. Unemployment eligibility hinges on whether the demotion was so significant (pay cut, loss of prestige, unfair handling) that a “reasonable worker” would quit. Courts will look at that.
    1. Document everything → How the offer was made, the pay difference, responsibilities lost, communications with HR/management.

Bottom line
• Not every demotion refusal = “resignation.”
• Missouri courts do side with employees when the change is drastic, unfair, or essentially a way to push you out.
• If you’re faced with this, don’t just walk away silently. Make the company say whether you’re terminated. That distinction matters for unemployment and legal rights.

Disclaimer: This is general information based on Missouri case law, not legal advice. If you’re directly affected, consult an employment attorney.