#teamdissolution

Posts mentioning hashtag #teamdissolution

Below are all the posts — topics as well as replies — that mention the hashtag #teamdissolution.

Mention #teamdissolution in your post to continue the discussion!

The bill has finally come due

For years, many of us watched the ISG organization abandon the very disciplines required to build successful enterprise software. Some spoke up. Most stayed silent. Leadership either didn't listen or simply didn't care.

Now the bill has finally come due.

Products are being shut down. Teams are being eliminated. Many good people are paying the price—not because they failed, but because leadership failed them.

This wasn't bad luck.

This wasn't "market conditions."

This wasn't AI.

This was years of poor execution, weak leadership, and a culture that stopped holding itself accountable.

Engineering operated without meaningful deadlines. Roadmaps became wish lists instead of commitments. Deliverables slipped quarter after quarter with few, if any, consequences.

Product Management became meaningless. Engineering dictated schedules and features it repeatedly failed to meet. The competition, with 1/10th the resources, moved three to five times faster in their velocities. Customers were promised capabilities that never materialized. Eventually leadership stopped publishing roadmaps altogether because they had lost all credibility.

None of this should surprise anyone. When an organization rewards excuses instead of execution, failure becomes inevitable. When commitments mean nothing, customers eventually notice. When accountability disappears, poor quality follows. When mediocrity is tolerated long enough, it becomes the culture.

No engineering organization succeeds without discipline. No product organization succeeds without accountability. No enterprise software company succeeds when deadlines become optional and execution becomes negotiable. The market eventually exposes every weakness that leadership chooses to ignore.

That's exactly what happened.

Companies the size of Dell don't fail overnight. They fail one missed commitment, one ignored warning, one delayed release, and one poor leadership decision at a time.

Eventually, reality always wins. The bill has finally come due.


Anyone impacted by minimum of 9 direct reports requirement

My team just moved managers to individual contributors because they had about far below the new minimum requirement of 9 directs. This was a major positive because they were very negative and known for micromanaging and creating rework for their directs and now the directs have a decent manager. Anyone else seeing good or bad things because of this rule? It looks like it’s rolling out faster in some groups that others.


Decimated teams

What happens to teams that get so decimated over several rounds to the point where they realistically can't do anything anymore? Do the remaining folks get reassigned to other teams? Do they keep existing in limbo until more people are hired (which would completely defeat the purpose of layoffs)? Or something else?


Flattening and Reorgs

Anticipating after these large numbers of people are off books (or before) , there will be a lot of shuffling of teams. Anyone know what happens when a Director or AD ends up without enough direct reports? Maybe there will still be enough employees left to re-allocate, but math-wise seems like there might be a lot of esp AD’s without the minimum number of people.
Wonder if the July target notifications will be like musical chairs for those without enough people left.


AirMI carnage

Talked to a former coworker who has survived the carnage at AirMI. The breadth of layoffs on the technical team is breathtaking. Either the plan is to move airbag manufacturing overseas and ignore all of the IP-related arguments to keep production in the US, or the forecast for future airbag development and production is dismal for many years out. Either way, a team that was creative, talented, and nimble has been decimated and will never be the same.


Flatter Org Delays Decisions

Managers spread too thin across dev teams become unavailable for decisions needed to proceed to next steps.

So developers wait a week for a standup to escalate a decision, which gets skipped by the spread-thin manager delaying resolutions further.

and the beat goes on slowly… until the team is dissolved.


Next WFR wave June

Massive reduction in force aligned for June under the code "restructuring". Starting July, company will operate under a completely new model. Won't get it into it here, but huge paring of middle managers (team leaders) and entire functions run under separate teams eliminated. 15 - 20 percent of workforce, to include all levels, VP, directors, IC.


Any news layoffs

Any news on upcoming layoffs. In our market, we have some organizational changes. Where there’s a small team and a large team under one supervisor that’s supposed to have different roles. One team will be working on building a program. The other team would continue to do what they’re doing. Thinking this may be a sign that they’re going to eliminate an entire team.


Now watch them hollow out the teams. Again.

I’ve been here over ten years, and I’ve witnessed a growing carelessness in selecting people for layoffs. Whatever criteria they claim to use, the reality is they disproportionately target the people who hold the institutional knowledge, understand the work inside out, and are critical to their teams. The complete loss of any long-term perspective by leadership, who have been driven purely by short-term incentives, is a fascinating and depressing spectacle.


Team members Being slashed

After being with the company for 10plus years State Farm decided to find an “issue” with a coverage we offer and then say we weren’t offering it correctly but still have to offer it. Got a whole team cut right before thanksgiving. The company is going downhill 1000%. All of our long time customers receiving NO notice or anything about this change. Just left in the dark with no clue what is going on.


The UNIFI development team was made redundant on Monday

Decades of experience tossed aside. They could have been redeployed but Waters has decided that when a product is no longer wanted by the business then neither are the people involved.

Limited support will transfer to Brasov who will only be making sure UNIFI can continue to function in waters_connect, even though the backbone of waters_connect is UNIFI.


What is the strategy here??

Can someone explain what the heck the corporate strategy is here? There have been so many layoffs that most teams around me were barely functional to begin with. Then came surprise voluntary severance, so now all of the most knowledgeable people are leaving voluntarily and probably won’t be backfilled. Teams are literally non functional, no one knows wtf to do, and instead of spending money on what we need (competent people) leadership is wasting money on sh-t like in person SKO and a completely pointless, expensive, disruptive IT migration. If you told me leadership was trying to go for another bankruptcy I’d believe you.
Every day I just smile and nod and try to survive because we don’t have enough resources to actually do anything … meanwhile supposedly AI will come save the day!