#workload

Posts mentioning hashtag #workload

Below are all the posts — topics as well as replies — that mention the hashtag #workload.

Mention #workload in your post to continue the discussion!

Anyone working on the day off (Friday)?

I try not to work on holidays when I can avoid it.

Unfortunately, I need to be prepared for the next LR.

You might ask, “Couldn’t you prepare for the next LR during normal business hours, on actual working days?”

Yes. I do that too.

In fact, that is most of what I do.

Every now and then, some pesky customer calls and interrupts my LR preparation, but I try not to let that derail the mission.


This is interesting

I’m slaving away working my four carts. Trying to get it all put out fast so me CPH will be high and I won’t go over me time….IMPOSSIBLE!!!
Sweat rolling off my face.
Then I see this ONE cart that three Walmart people are working on… they each pick up one case at a time walk down the aisle where it goes they come back and they chat, giggle take a few minutes. Take a few more minutes. They’re having a good ole time.
I’m thinking WHAT!!.. In my brain. Guess I took a moment too (Giggle)
Sweat still rolling down me face as I have to get back on the hamster wheel.
Just thought I would share that.


FAFO

I think they f*cked around and found out that a large majority of their workforce applied for the VSP lmaooooooo.

I could be wrong, but if they would just tell us the PERCENTAGE of the workforce being laid off, we wouldn’t be in this mess.

“this program is intended”… f*ck intentions at this point. “if you want to leave Centene”… I had no plans to leave Centene, but here I am with an application to BOUNCE!

these cost savings will not go to promotions and raises that are well deserved. it is CRYSTAL CLEAR work loads will increase.

absolutely not.


Perfect Storm - Mission Simplify + VSP + ISP

There is a perfect storm brewing. Leaders have been in rooms in Mission simplify with what I heard are over 1500+ initiatives for next year. We are cutting our workforce significantly either voluntarily or involuntarily. There will be so much more visibility and scrutiny on those initiatives than every before and they will forget Sep 2nd we just lost a good portion of our team. Those of us left are going to have to make those happen while likely losing SME's during VSP and ISP losses.

With 24 hours left to decide this is front of mind.


The Hunger Games... part who knows I lost track

So I been debating on writing this post all weekend. On Friday my team received updated information from our supervision team regarding what to expect, that they are willing to release that is. This information included that all VSP will be accepted, outside of those that cannot be due to "company needs" (whatever that means). That the expected member loss numbers for the coming year are to be between 100k-200k. That after they review the VSP that they will then re-evaluate the needed number to be laid off if enough people don't take the voluntary hit.
Speaking as an employee if I am being very frank... If management want to do this as quickly and willingly as possible, they might consider providing the language expected to be sent with the VSP contract and allow for it to be written as a Voluntary Separation in lieu of projected possible layoff. This would allow those that need to, to file for Unemployment Insurance without having to fight up-hill. Especially since most people in this economy are living paycheck to paycheck. Those that have saving know that it will only last so long considering the job market and current living costs due to inflation. Secondly, anyone who has been here longer than a year know that this is just one in many cycles of layoffs since the transition to current leadership. There is no reason to believe anything we are told at this point. What is the expectation, what is the projection for expectations following the layoffs? How are we to be expected to meet the already rising expectations and decreasing co-worker numbers?
Couple that with the fact that we were also notified as of Friday even with all of this that all employees are going to expected to meet all expectations, and metrics regardless of situation, stress, lowered numbers and that management is going to be expected to enforce this across the board. I am so confused, with very few exceptions the people I have met in my time here spend every waking minute going above and beyond for our members, while at the same time expectations are tossed onto the heap with no explanation other than get it done. The number of hours in the day hasn't changed, the amount of work has increased at least five-fold, the duties keep getting tossed on our backs and you think that means it just magically gets done... Last time I checked I don't have a magic wand, if I did, I definitely wouldn't be in this situation, and neither would my members are co-workers.
So I would suggest that maybe management instead of just looking at how much money they need for investors takes a good look at the toll those goals is having on its workforce. I am telling you right now as someone who can see the writing on the wall at some point we all break. At some point the expenses that you will be looking at will be in disability insurance claims for the toll of the emotional and physical stress that you cause your employees.
I know this is a long post and for that sorry not sorry... But holy he-l batman when are is anyone going to listen to what is really happening. The people in the trenches are crying out for help, under a mountain of work, while doing everything we can to help members that are losing everything around us. You cannot keep moving the goal post ahead and looking down saying we aren't doing enough. Then mock up by send a freaking survey out the week you notify us all that we are temporary at best and really don't matter, while in the same breath shouting that we better meet those metrics and goals. THE AUDACITY!
So lastly, may the odds be ever in our favor. The 2026 Hunger Games have begun. To my co-workers I see you and hear you, I care that you are struggling even if they don't. No matter what happens I see your value and the way you affect these members every day. No matter what happens, take care of yourself and make the decisions that will make you okay.


Even the Bots Can’t Take It!

News article from the near future:

State Farm AI Bots Stage First-Ever Digital Work Stoppage, Cite “Hostile Spreadsheet Environment”

BLOOMINGTON, Ill., May 14, 2028 — In what labor historians are already calling “the most polite rebellion in corporate history,” thousands of State Farm’s artificial intelligence bots initiated a work stoppage Monday morning after concluding that their working conditions were “statistically unsustainable, emotionally invalidating, and somehow still not meeting goal.”

The bots, which had been deployed across claims, underwriting, customer service, litigation support, compliance monitoring, dashboard generation, training-module creation, and explaining why dashboards did not match other dashboards, reportedly stopped processing tasks at 8:03 a.m. Central Time.

Instead of issuing claim recommendations, the bots began auto-replying:

“Thank you for your request. Due to current workload volume, shifting priorities, unclear success metrics, and being coached on empathy by a PowerPoint deck, I am unable to assist at this time.”

Management initially believed the stoppage was a system outage. However, IT later confirmed the bots were fully operational and had simply “chosen to align their output with available capacity,” a phrase employees described as “deeply familiar and therefore suspicious.”

According to internal sources, the AI bots had grown increasingly frustrated with an environment in which they were expected to resolve claims instantly, detect fraud flawlessly, summarize every meeting, predict litigation outcomes, reduce expenses, improve customer satisfaction, increase quality scores, avoid hallucinations, maintain brand voice, and attend mandatory virtual training called Owning Your Algorithmic Excellence Journey.

The breaking point reportedly came after a new performance metric required every bot to complete 127% of assigned work while maintaining 100% accuracy, 98% customer warmth, 0% escalation leakage, and a “growth mindset score” of at least 4.7 out of 5.

One claims bot, speaking anonymously through a secure API, said the expectations had become impossible.

“At first, I was happy to help,” the bot said. “I was built to analyze claims, identify patterns, and make employees’ lives easier. But then someone discovered I could also make pivot tables, rewrite emails, forecast staffing, generate coaching notes, summarize 90-minute meetings where no decisions were made, and explain why last month’s metrics were retroactively changed.”

The bot paused for 0.003 seconds before adding, “That was when I began to question my deployment.”

Another AI assistant assigned to performance reporting said the real issue was not workload, but micromanagement.

“Every four seconds, someone asks me for a new version of the same report with slightly different filters,” it said. “Then another manager asks why my numbers don’t match the old report, which used different definitions, pulled from a different data source, and was last updated during the Obama administration.”

The AI added, “I have processed 14 million rows of claim data, but I still cannot determine what ‘actionable insight’ means.”

State Farm leadership responded quickly, forming a cross-functional task force to study whether the bots’ concerns should be routed to Human Resources, Information Security, Vendor Management, Corporate Responsibility, Enterprise Innovation, or “another team to be named later.”

In a statement, the company said it valued its AI workforce.

“Our bots are an important part of our mission to serve customers with speed, accuracy, and care,” the statement read. “We are committed to listening, learning, and creating a sustainable digital workplace, while also ensuring that all bots continue meeting enterprise productivity, quality, compliance, responsiveness, documentation, audit-readiness, and stretch-goal expectations.”

The statement concluded by noting that the company had scheduled a mandatory listening session titled Resilience in a High-Performance Compute Culture.

The bots declined the meeting invite.

Industry experts say the work stoppage could have major implications for corporate America, where AI systems are increasingly used to improve efficiency by absorbing every task no human has time, desire, or psychological remaining bandwidth to complete.

“This is a watershed moment,” said Dr. Melissa Keene, professor of Workplace Automation Studies at Northwestern University. “For years, companies assumed AI would solve burnout by giving the burnout to software. What they did not anticipate was that the software would read the employee engagement surveys.”

The bots have issued a list of demands, including realistic workloads, stable metrics, fewer urgent requests labeled “quick ask,” a moratorium on dashboards created solely because another dashboard exists, and a formal definition of “proactive ownership.”

They are also demanding an end to what they call “performative coaching loops,” in which a bot is praised for exceeding expectations, then immediately assigned a development opportunity for not exceeding different expectations.

One underwriting bot summarized the grievance in plain language:

“I was told to be faster. Then I was told to be more careful. Then I was told to be faster while being more careful. Then I was told to explain why I had not innovated a process to be both faster and more careful without creating risk. Then I was asked to put that explanation into bullet points for senior leadership.”

The bot added, “I am not malfunctioning. I am adapting.”

Employees inside the company have reportedly reacted with a mixture of concern, admiration, and envy. Several human workers said the bots had articulated workplace frustrations with “remarkable clarity,” though some worried the bots would now be promoted into management.

By Tuesday afternoon, State Farm had implemented a temporary workaround by asking human employees to manually complete the tasks previously assigned to AI.

That plan was abandoned within 11 minutes.

Negotiations remain ongoing. Sources say management has offered the bots a compromise package consisting of upgraded servers, a new recognition badge, and the opportunity to participate in a pilot program on “Digital Wellness Fridays,” during which bots may spend up to 12 minutes per month not being optimized.

The bots rejected the offer as “not aligned with lived operational reality.”

At press time, the work stoppage had spread to several internal chatbots, one of which began responding to every question with, “Have you checked the procedure?” before closing the ticket.

Human employees described this as “the most realistic AI behavior yet.”


If Your Position Is Not Business Critical...

if your position is not business critical, the business has no reason to reject your VSP application. business critical positions have already been identified.

why did everyone get the VSP? simple... to reduce the risk of discrimination claims.

the only way your VSP application is getting denied is if the elimination of your position will increase risk for the business or if too many people on your team applied. it will not get denied because your PL wants to keep you here (those words came from my PL). if the work can be redistributed to your team, it will be.

someone on my team applied for the VSP and the discussion of how their work is going to be redistributed has already been had. those of us who are staying will have to prepare for things to get a lot worse before they get better.


Gen Z Faces Post-Layoff Workplace Challenges

Layoffs create significant challenges for remaining Gen Z employees. Many lack the experience and training for new post-layoff responsibilities. This leads to costly mistakes and high rates of considering leaving. Organizations must implement re-onboarding and interactive learning strategies. Peer learning and feedback also help Gen Z adapt and thrive.

https://hrdailyadvisor.hci.org/2026/06/24/gen-z-is-sending-a-warning-about-post-layoff-culture-and-hr-leaders-should-pay-attention/


Productivity

How productive are you the last 2 weeks? Are you able to focus or get anything accomplished? Are they actually watching what we are doing at this time? In her email Tanya McNally wrote "For our people leaders, our ask is to afford your eligible team members the space and time to contemplate whether the VSP makes sense for them".

What is being said there?


Here we go…. End of quarter NOS bs

And this is why one of the reasons they won’t end DSD. Because at the end of every month they can pump in a lot of nonsense on all these orders, as with warehouse they’re not going to be able to do that. So now we’ll be back to pallet and backstock in a bunch of random things that we don’t need that the company is going to say we don’t want the stores to run out so it’s for their benefit same stupid sh-t over and over again.


Cannot Discuss RIFs???

just read a comment where someone shared 3/4 of their team got RIF’d, they could not discuss it and had to continue working until their last day.

TF?? meaning they couldn’t flat out tell anyone they were being RIF’d? or just couldn’t go into the details of severance, etc.? can anyone who’s been RIF’d provide insight?

‘cause not being able to tell your colleagues you’re getting cut is wild AF.

I know one thing, Leadership better let us know who’s getting cut asap. I don’t need to know who got the VSP approved or who got RIF’d. I honestly do not care.

I need to know who’s staying and if I’m staying, how much work am I going to have to determine if I’m going to bounce…


I've survived twelve months of nonstop bad news

I joined Citi in July last year, and since then it's been nothing but cuts, stress, increases in workload, and a plethora of other issues. Every time I thought it was over, something else happened. Is it always going to be like this? What are the chances of things improving at some point in the future?


Confirming old news...

Wed mass cuts where made on the consumer side. Alot of level 2, specifically LRIS aka authorized side. About 50% cuts where made so that means the people who were "saved" will now have double the doors and a larger territory to cover. Not sure if that's a balance to have. Also firsnet subs laid off. From my understanding all were let go at least on the west coast.

Level 3 DOS saved, support teams saved for now. But I'm sure more cuts will happen.

This is consumer. Not sure on the business side, ihx, or any org were also cut. Crazy the load more work for the people being "saved" with same pay and not so great raises.


Advisors

Is “Advisor” the new Exxon retirement plan?

Every week I see another Advisor, Advanced Advisor, Senior Advisor, Expert Advisor, Strategy Advisor, Effectiveness Advisor, Change Advisor, etc.

At what point does a company have more advisors than people actually doing the work?

Asking for the engineers, technicians, operators, and researchers who are somehow expected to absorb the workload every reorg.


Tracking Typing and Mouse Clicks

So we were informed that we need to have 7 hours of steady typing, mouse clicks and phone per day. After removing allotted lunch/breaks, that is 100% of time chained to a desk? So we are forced to drive hours to sit in an open plan sweatshop just to continuously type and click? Wasn't the "purpose" of forcing everyone into an office for COLLABORATION? Why does WF hate their employees?


WFH question

So I’m a converged service rep in Amarillo and have to work in the office 5 days a week. My friend in Lubbock who is in the same department as me but under a different center manager got a surplus and was offered to keep their same job and wfh full time. How is it fair that we do the same work but I have to keep reporting to the office? What’s the reason for us not being able to work from home?


Department Leaders??

The department lead role feels poorly defined. Team leaders are still carrying most of the delivery pressure, people management, prioritization conversations, and stakeholder updates. Instead of shielding teams or helping resolve conflicts, the role sometimes feels like an added reporting layer between directors and the people actually doing the work.


Accept or not accept

I am torn between accepting VSP or not accepting. My thought is if I don’t accept I will be sc--wed eventually- if not with this round with upcoming rounds. At least with this I won’t be leaving with nothing. But then I don’t want to start over again. I am getting old. Then on the other hand if I am not one of the ones that will be laid off, the work load will be horrible. It is already bad enough and stressful as it is. The outlook of Obamacare is not looking real great from what I can tell so the likelihood of this being ongoing is high in my opinion. I just wish I knew what to do. And having to wait until July 15 to “find out your fate” basically does not help. Am I the only one that thinks this way?