#compliance

The New York Legislature passed a bill called the "No Severance Ultimatums Act." This bill imposes new requirements on employers offering severance agreements to employees. Employers must provide 21 calendar days for consideration and a 7-day revocation period. The Act expands federal protections, like those in OWBPA, to all New York employees regardless of age. If signed into law, non-compliant severance agreements would be void and unenforceable immediately.

https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/new-york-s-no-severance-ultimatums-act-1086745/

Long Term Boca Retiree here. The Florida Office of Insurance Regulation released it market conduct investigations report in April 26. Truspire is going out with a literal bang !

Florida cited and fined both Mutual of America & Truspire over a collective $60,000 in fines for violating Florida law & insurance statues. These were over some BS LTC filing. But, MoA & Truspire received more fines (5) then any other insurance company. Not sure who in the legal area w/the states dropped the ball but this is very embarrasing. For more details go to:

FLOIR.gov

and read for yourselves.

Someone was asleep at the switch. time to dock his pay or ship his role to India.

My friend is a director in compliance and works with facilities CHQ & coming in 2027 hearing we’ll be implementing badge in badge out to ensure people are in the office. Also being said Q4 they’re advised to review reports of people who are not in 4 days a week. They were originally pursuing the idea of tying in office personnel, bonuses to days in office, but couldn’t make it equitable for the work from home employees..

https://www.beckerspayer.com/legal/elevance-pays-cms-342m-amid-medicare-

Elevance Health paid CMS $342 million following a Medicare Advantage sanction notice alleging the insurer did not properly address overpayments for years.

June 22 filings in a New York federal court included an email from an Elevance vice president to CMS, confirming the payment was a “remittance of the total overpayment amount” related to the Risk Adjustment Overpayment Reporting module. Elevance conducted the wire transfer May 27, and CMS confirmed receipt the next day.

On May 29, a separate CMS letter informed Elevance that it had received the company’s attestation, but it did not specify the payment amount at the time. That step, along with initial submissions to the appropriate electronic systems, temporarily staved off intermediate sanctions. However, CMS said the insurer has until the end of June and July to complete further tasks — such as resolving issues across other risk-adjustment modules and addressing additional overpayment issues — before sanctions kick in.

The most recent filings also included a June 22 letter from the U.S. attorney’s office to the judge, challenging Elevance’s desire for additional discovery regarding the sanction notice.

“To the extent Anthem [now Elevance] wishes to challenge CMS’ administrative action, this is not the appropriate forum to do so,” the letter said.

CMS told Elevance in February that it would impose sanctions affecting MA prescription dr-g plan enrollment and communications due to a lack of compliance with risk-adjustment data submission requirements, interfering with the return of overpayments.

Elevance CFO Mark Kaye previously said the company had set aside $935 million to address the dispute. As of February, Elevance had about 2 million MA members.

This case is not the only source of tension between Elevance and the federal government right now. A Justice Department lawsuit first filed in 2020 alleges False Claims Act violations.

“Elevance Health continues to engage in constructive dialogue with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services,” an Elevance spokesperson told Becker’s June 26. “We remain optimistic that a resolution can be reached and value our longstanding relationship with CMS.”

CMS said, if any sanctions take effect, current MA beneficiaries will continue to access their coverage and benefits as usual, since the sanctions would only apply to new enrollments and communications.

“CMS is committed to ensuring accurate Medicare Advantage (MA) payments, compliance with federal requirements and the protection of taxpayer dollars. Accurate and timely submission of MA risk adjustment data is essential to ensure Medicare pays appropriately for the beneficiaries they serve,” CMS told Becker’s in a June 29 statement.

Typical Citi, their FAQ to fired employees says you still have to receive trade preclearance while on Garden leave. But when you call compliance they have no idea how to preclear you because you're no longer in the system and HR just sends an auto reply that they'll get back to you at their convenience .....

So, if I sell stocks am I going to lose my Severance because Citi is too incompetent to put proper procedures in place to pre-clear those in let go?

I'm so glad I was let go. It's like I was in a bad relationship but needed to be broken up with. I just can't wait to be done with this place.

Just got hit with two emails about two CU trainings that are "required to be completed" by October 27: Annual Ethics and Compliance Training and, naturally, Annual Security & AI Risk.

Read the room, Sarah. Read the room.

Our L3 shared the 2 part guidance he was given in May for making a surplus recommendation. This was delivered to us as tough-love-don't-be-this-guy kind of advice.

1. Out of compliance on anything.
   or
2. Weakest link on a team for 2 consecutive Qtrs.

You will volunteer through your actions. I will no longer choose who leaves.

If plans have contracts with states, how will this affect those? They can't pull out of a state until the contract ends, can they? What happens when staff leave or are let go & the company can't fulfill the contract requirements? Can states sue? Would Centene do that?

Based on what I have read, Fiserv appears to be making significant staffing cuts, similar to those recently seen at FIS. Many of the employees affected held roles that are essential to keeping the global banking system stable and secure, including cybersecurity professionals who help prevent intrusions, developers and testers who review code and ensure systems function properly, and compliance personnel who help ensure regulatory requirements are met.

When these teams are reduced or stretched too thin, the risk of gaps in oversight, system reliability, and operational resilience increases. It raises serious questions about whether organizations like FIS would have the staffing, expertise, and capacity needed to respond quickly and effectively in the event of a major disruption, such as a natural disaster affecting a data center.

Overall, these developments have me concerned about the resilience of the banking infrastructure we all depend on. I would welcome greater scrutiny from auditors or regulators, because the combination of deep staffing cuts, rising operational complexity, and critical financial infrastructure could create vulnerabilities that may not become visible until a serious failure occurs.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/legalindustry/ex-att-lawyer-who-raised-compliance-concerns-accused-ethics-violations-2026-06-23/

Im assuming there are a lot of knowledgeable individuals here who may be able to clarify this.
Can someone explain whether banks are legally required to comply with search warrants issued by a local police department in cases involving fraudulent wire transfers?
I recently had a fraudulent wire transfer claim with Bank of America that was denied. At the same time, I filed a police report with my local police department. In an effort to investigate and identify the suspect, the detective has issued multiple search warrants to the bank.
However, the bank has not responded to these warrants.
My question is: are banks required to comply with search warrants issued by local law enforcement, and if so, what typically happens when they do not respond or delay compliance?
Any insight would be appreciated.

Just had asset protection visit our office and do a presentation on how reports and investigations are handled!
I have been here 27 years and I have never seen these guys show up somewhere in person and usually you didn't even know they were here!!
Very suspicious they would even have a meeting with our group, has anyone else had this happen to them?
they even had a Q and A session after on their procedures.

https://www.businessinsider.com/microsoft-was-in-talks-to-lease-oracle-compute-capacity-2026-6?op=1

Microsoft was recently in talks with Oracle about leasing the company's cloud infrastructure, but the deal fell through due to security and compliance concerns, according to people familiar with the matter.

One of the people said that the deal could have been worth more than $3 billion.

The failed talks highlight a growing reality of the AI bo-m: even the world's largest technology companies are running short on computing power. As demand for AI services soars, cloud providers like Microsoft are increasingly competing not just for customers but for the infrastructure and capacity needed to run their own products.

That scramble is driving an unusual wave of partnerships, capacity-sharing agreements, and multibillion-dollar infrastructure deals as companies race to secure enough computing resources to support the next generation of AI.

Microsoft recently projected that its capital expenditures for the 2026 calendar year will reach $190 billion, largely to expand data center capacity. The company has already turned to Amazon to add capacity for its GitHub code development business to address recent outages.

Microsoft is seeking a deal or deals with other cloud providers to prioritize its own Azure cloud computing resources on customers, the people said. "We are shopping for capacity everywhere," one of the people said.

The plan was to move some Microsoft workloads to Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, but Oracle's public cloud did not have the Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP), a standardized security framework that ensures cloud services are secure enough to handle U.S. government data. Oracle was not willing to add this framework, one of the people said.

The ExxonMobil Operations Integrity Management System (OIMS) is a comprehensive framework designed to manage safety, security, health, and environmental risks across the organization, ensuring operational excellence and continuous improvement.

Purpose and Importance
The OIMS framework establishes common expectations for managing the inherent risks associated with ExxonMobil's operations. It emphasizes the importance of Operations Integrity (OI), which encompasses all aspects of the business that can impact personnel safety, process safety, security, health, and environmental performance. The system is integral to ExxonMobil's commitment to conducting business responsibly and sustainably, ensuring that safety and environmental considerations are prioritized in all operations.

Key Components of OIMS
11 Elements of OIMS: The framework consists of 11 key elements that guide the implementation of effective management systems. These elements include:

(1) Management Leadership, Commitment, and Accountability
(2) Risk Assessment and Management
(3) Facilities Design and Construction
(4) Information/Documentation
(5) Personnel and Training
(6) Operations and Maintenance
(7) Management of Change
(8) Third-Party Services
(9) Incident Investigation and Analysis
(10) Community Awareness and Emergency Preparedness
(11) Operations Integrity Assessment and Improvement

Continuous Improvement: OIMS is designed to be a dynamic framework that is periodically updated to reflect new insights and best practices. This includes strengthening expectations related to leadership, environmental performance, and behavior-based safety

Commitment to Safety: ExxonMobil promotes a culture where all employees and contractors are responsible for managing risks and ensuring safety. The framework encourages personal accountability and proactive intervention to prevent incidents, aligning with the company's vision of a workplace where "Nobody Gets Hurt"

Implementation and Evaluation
The application of the OIMS framework is mandatory across all ExxonMobil operations, with a focus on design, construction, and operational phases. Management is responsible for ensuring that systems are in place and effective, with ongoing evaluations to assess compliance with the framework's expectations. This includes internal and external assessments to gauge the effectiveness of the OIMS implementation .

In summary, ExxonMobil's OIMS is a critical component of its operational strategy, aimed at enhancing safety, environmental stewardship, and overall operational integrity through structured management practices and continuous improvement efforts.

The U.S. Justice Department has reportedly sent subpoenas to several of the country’s largest banks, including JPMorgan Chase JPM and Bank of America BAC, over allegations of politically motivated account closures.

Other banks under investigation include Wells Fargo WFC.

Some of the subpoenas were issued to the banks last year by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Washington, D.C., led by Jeanine Pirro. The probe is focused on claims that these banks have “debanked” clients, meaning they have inappropriately closed customer accounts due to political reasons, the Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/news/jpmorgan-bofa-wells-fargo-subpoenaed-by-doj-in-trumps-explosive-debanking-crackdown-report/ar-AA25nPc6

T&Cs for me but not for thee?

https://dailyjournal.com/article/392055-judge-certifies-class-action-accusing-ricoh-of-systematic-printer-service-overbilling

At what point do state Attorney Generals and the federal investigators step in? This wasn't just a normal data breach, they got patient info AND provider account information. It is probably much worse than this press release even admits.

https://portal.ct.gov/dss/press-room/press-releases/connecticut-department-of-social-services-and-gainwell-technologies-notice-of-data-security-incident?language=en_US

https://dallasexpress.com/national/h-1b-fraud-claims-back-in-spotlight-after-fox-segment-on-fake-degrees/

Nearly 7 million visas processed since 2015

➡️ 70% from India

➡️ 12% from China

🔹 A former official told Newsweek 80-90% of applications from India involved fraudulent documents or unqualified applicants

🔹 A network of universities selling fake degrees is now under investigation with one university allegedly selling 36,000+ fake degrees

Any rumors? Hearing Compliance will be impacted.

Waters hasn't been posting salary ranges for US-based roles in MA and California. Pay transparency, y'all! State fines are definitely incoming. HR is messed up. Live your legend!

I wonder if Dell will have its ethics and compliance training this year?

Coming from an unethical and corrupt group of people would be pretty ridiculous.

CDF Labor Law will host an online webinar on June 18, 2026. It offers practical advice for handling workforce reductions. The program aims to minimize legal risks and compliance traps. Attorneys Todd Wulffson and Alessandra Whipple will present the session. This event targets employers, HR professionals, and in-house counsel.

https://www.cdflaborlaw.com/events/cdf-webinar-less-layoff-litigation-pro-tips-for-conducting-reductions-in-force-in-california

There have been reports of some H-1B employees at CVS, particularly those approaching visa renewal periods, being encouraged to relocate to Canada after the company decided not to continue visa sponsorship or pursue employment-based green card processing. In certain situations, these contractors reportedly continue working remotely for CVS from Canada shortly after relocating.

This raises important questions regarding cross-border employment arrangements, immigration compliance, and tax obligations in both the United States and Canada. Remote work from Canada for a U.S.-based employer may require appropriate authorization and adherence to Canadian immigration and labor regulations.

Concerns have also been raised about whether all necessary Canadian work authorization and compliance processes are being consistently reviewed or monitored for individuals in these arrangements. Given the potential legal and regulatory implications, this is an area that may warrant greater transparency and oversight.

#H1B #Immigration #WorkVisa #RemoteWork #CanadaJobs #USImmigration #CrossBorderEmployment #VisaSponsorship #EmploymentLaw #GlobalWorkforce #ImmigrationCompliance #TaxCompliance #WorkAuthorization #CorporateCompliance #LaborLaw #GreenCard #TechWorkers #HealthcareIndustry #CVS #InternationalWorkers #SaveAmericanJobs

when you optimize for one thing, you usually suboptimize something else.

so now we spend energy on trivial stuff like badging, attendance, and proving people are physically present, while less time goes into the actual work. the work is still there. it just gets buried under another layer of compliance theater.

wells fargo has always had a problem with truth and trust. in good times, people work around it. in tough times, it gets harder to hide.

that’s when the cracks show.

The most recent mandatory course on fincrimes included an example of bad things happening when firms operate outside the law - the GS Malaysian corruption scandal that cost GS $600 million to settle. Anyone wanna guess the initials of one of the GS execs implicated. (Google it)

How is this allowed when STS is so behind on tech compared to others in industry? When others cant do anything that will get approved by compliance

https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=26170519&gfv=1

https://www.stocktitan.net/sec-filings/FTDR/form-4-frontdoor-inc-insider-trading-activity-f2fdb9b25268.html

Overnight decision to move then out of the sla-ghter house currently known as Tech moves under Nish. Do we really need a chief privacy officer in that model and do we need over twenty people in a second line role where all of their functions were first line centric ? If we think of efficiencies and what matters for members this is pretty easy. This groups previous leadership fought tooth and nail when anyone dared to mention they belong in second line. (Judy and her leadership team) time to clean house I guess this is a no brainer. Any bets on what happens to a 25 person first line team moving into second line ?

Anybody notice an increase in compliance related terminations. I have seen both announcements on bulletin boards about disciplinary action. The company is taken against people for various things recently as well as hearing about individuals who have been terminated. Do we think this is an increase?

We have decided to bring HR, Legal, Compliance and Corporate Affairs together under Keeley Aleman in an expanded role as Waters General Counsel and Head of Global Human Resources.

We are grateful for Cheryl Kennedy’s leadership and contributions over the past year, as she helped support our people and advance our HR strategy during an important period for the company. Cheryl has left Waters and we wish her the very best.

Who in their right mind would “bring HR, Legal, Compliance and Corporate Affairs together?”

Went in office for only a couple hours connecting with the IP address and HR counts as a compliance on Workday.

It is an open secret that many employees across major hubs—including Hopkins—are navigating the RTO mandate by doing the bare minimum, coming in person for few hours/two days a week, leaving laptops on Monday locked with Kensington T-Bar laptop Lock ($15) at or under a desks overnight to simulate presence, and take them off on Thursday or Friday. They all got 100% RTO compliance for last 4-5 months given RTO enforcement uses IP address tracking which is also our OFFICIAL "Talent" and "Performance" Metric for year 2026 (no other company or bank has this metric).

It’s an open secret that most employees hit 60-100% compliance while they were actually working from home, just by using U.S.bank Teams (attend meetings from home) and Outlook (compose reply emails) all from mobile phones at home or elsewhere (Hawaii vacation). I myself tried last month at Knoxville and yes it worked, but made sure to just get 60% RTO compliance so I do not get caught, but surprised to see many doing it without any fear.

Question: Why did Gunjan approved this ineffective 60% RTO compliance by our D-MB SEVP-HR with IP tracking as performance metric? What were she thinking? Is Gunja equally D-MB - like the CXO suite mocks her?

US House of Representatives
SELECT COMMITTEE ON THE CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY
548 Cannon House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515
(202) 225-6002

May 2, 2023

Mr. John Donahoe
President, and Chief Executive Officer Nike, Inc.
One Bowerman Drive Beaverton, OR 97005

Dear Mr. Donahoe,

On March 23, 2023, the House Select Committee on the Strategic Competition between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) held a hearing entitled, "The Chinese Communist Party's Ongoing Uyghur Genocide." At the hearing, we heard first-hand witness accounts about the CCP's concentration camps and expert testimony regarding the perpetration of genocide. We also received written testimony in which an expert assessed that "American companies are financing the state-sponsored forced labor programs in the Uyghur Region."1 We seek additional information regarding this matter.

The U.S. Department of State has determined that the CCP is committing genocide against Uyghurs and other minority groups in Xinjiang. 2 In response to the CCP's atrocities, Congress passed the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) with bipartisan support. On December 23, 2021, the UFLPA was signed into law. The UFLPA prohibits the "importation of any goods made with forced labor, including those goods mined, produced, or manufactured wholly or in part in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region."

1. We received expert testimony which revealed that products made by Uyghurs in forced labor camps are still entering the United States. 4 One expert told the Select Committee that Nike is "sourcing garments made not only from cotton from the Uyghur Region but also viscose, lyocell, polyester, leather, and linen from the region."5 Continuing to import goods produced in part with

1 The Chinese Communist Party's Ongoing Uyghur Genocide: Hearing before the Select Comm. on Strategic Competition between the U.S. and CCP, 118 Cong. (Mar. 23, 2023) (Written Testimony ofNury Turkel) ("CCP's Uyghur Genocide Hearing").
2 Edward Wong & Chris Buckley, U.S. Says China's Repression of Uighurs Is 'Genocide', N.Y. TIMES (July 27,
2021).
3 Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act, H.R. 6256, I 16th Cong. (2021).
4 CCP's Uyghur Genocide Hearing (Written Testimony ofNury Turkel).
5 Id; According to a Sheffield Hallam University study, Nike is at high risk of having Xinjiang cotton in its supply chain due to its relationship with international intermediary manufacturers and Chinese textile companies sourcing

the forced labor of Uyghurs potentially violates the UFLPA and creates the conditions in which the CCP is able to continue committing genocide.
We would like to offer Nike an opportunity to respond to these serious allegations and to provide information regarding its compliance with the UFLPA. We therefore request that you respond to the following questions by May 16, 2023:

1. Do any garments imported into the United States by Nike contain inputs sourced from Xinjiang and/or inputs made with forced labor ofUyghurs?
2. Please provide a detailed description of the steps Nike has taken since the UFLPA took effect to examine its supply chains with respect to forced labor risk in the manufacture of its products. How do these steps differ, if at all, from the methods utilized before the UFLPA took effect?
3. Please provide a detailed description of the steps Nike has taken since the UFLPA took effect to ensure garments it sells that are made from cotton, viscose, lyocell, polyester, leather, and linen are not manufactured using forced labor by Uyghurs or other minority groups who are subjugated by the CCP.
4. Please provide a detailed description of the steps Nike has taken to examine its other supply chains to ensure that other products it sells are not produced by forced labor undertaken by Uyghurs or other minority groups who are subjugated by the CCP.
5. Do any of Nike's garment suppliers use fabric and/or yarn from any of the following corporations (including their subsidiaries): Jiangsu Lianfa Group, Luthai Textile, Huafu Fashion, Texhong Textile, or Weiqiao Textile?
6. Is fabric and/or yarn made by any of the corporations referenced above used in the production of Nike clothing sold in the United States? If so, please list each corporation whose fabric and/or yarn is used in the manufacture of Nike clothing sold in the United States.
7. If fabric and/or yarn from one of the corporations referenced above is used in the production of Nike clothing sold in the United States, what specific steps does Nike take to ensure that none of this material is made in, or contains cotton from, Xinjiang?
8. Has Nike contractually obligated all its garment suppliers to ensure that no inputs from Xinjiang are used in the manufacture of its clothes sold in the United States? Please provide all relevant documents to support such obligations.

cotton and employing state-sponsored labor transfers from the Uyghur Region. Most of the Chinese textile companies identified in the study have subsidiaries in Xinjiang that have employed state-sponsored labor transfers. See, Laura T. Murphy et al., Laundering Cotton: How Xinjiang Cotton Is Obscured in International Supply Chains, SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY (Nov. 2021).

1. What specific methods, other than mere written or verbal assurance from a garment supplier, does Nike use to verify that the supplier is not using inputs from Xinjiang?

I 0. What audit methods does Nike use to verify that suppliers in China-in and outside of Xinjiang-are not exploiting Uyghurs through state-sponsored labor transfers, given that workers in China cannot speak to auditors about forced labor without fear of government retaliation? Please provide all policies, guidelines, requirements, reviews, assessments, analyses, audits, PowerPoint or other presentations, or other documents that describe, govern, implement, or report conduct, processes, or results (without regard to the title of a given document) that are relevant to the conduct of such audits, as well as copies of any communications pertaining to any incident involving actual, alleged, or anticipated noncompliance with the UFLPA.

1. Has Nike conclusively identified every supplier of fabric, cotton, and yarn in its global supply chain for products sold in the United States? If yes, please provide documents and evidence to substantiate Nike's conclusive identification of such fabric, cotton, and yarn suppliers, including any documents evidencing Nike's methodology with respect to this determination. If not, please provide a detailed explanation of how Nike assesses whether its clothing imports comply with the UFLPA, including any documents describing Nike's methodology with respect to such assessments.

2. Does Nike allow cotton and/or other inputs produced in Xinjiang to be used in the manufacture of Nike clothing sold in markets outside of North America?

3. In 2020, reporting revealed that hundreds of Uyghur laborers worked in a factory that manufactures 8 million pairs ofNikes each year.6 Nike claims to have verified that this factory-owned by a leading Nike Supplier, TKG Taekwang-no longer uses Uyghur forced labor. Given its track record of using forced labor, how did Nike verify that TKG Taekwang no longer uses forced labor? And why does Nike still consider TKG Taekwang to be a suitable business partner?

4. Please provide a detailed description of the steps Nike is taking to examine and monitor its supply chains on an ongoing basis. Please provide all policies, guidelines, requirements, reviews, assessments, analyses, audits, PowerPoint or other presentations, or other documents (without regard to the title of a given document) that describe, govern, implement, or report conduct, processes, or results relevant to the conduct of such examination and monitoring.

5. Please provide a detailed description of your audit and compliance plan(s), and the steps taken thus far to implement controls to ensure that Nike products are not produced by forced labor and that all Nike products are obtained and sold in compliance with the requirements of the UFLPA. Please provide all policies, guidelines, requirements, reviews, assessments, analyses, audits, PowerPoint or other presentations, or other documents (without regard to the title of a given document) that describe, govern,

6 Anna Fifield, China compels Uighurs to work in shoefacto,y that supplies Nike, WASH. POST (Feb. 29, 2020).

implement, or report conduct, processes, or results relevant to Nike's audit and compliance plan(s).

The House Select Committee on the Strategic Competition between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party has broad authority to "investigate and submit policy recommendations on the status of the Chinese Communist Party's economic, technological, and security progress and its competition with the United States" under H. Res. 11. Upon your receipt of this letter, please maintain and preserve all hard copy and electronic documents, including electronic communications, related to the subject matter of these questions.

To make arrangements to deliver a response, please contact Select Committee majority and minority staff at (202) 226-9678 and (202) 225-2489, respectively.

Thank you for your attention to this important matter and prompt reply.

Sincerely,

-
Mike Gallagher
Chairman

Ranking Member

How strict is VG on the background check for licensed client facing roles?

• Clean U4
• Clean credit 820+ score
• Don’t drink/do dr-gs
• No felonies
• 2 misdemeanors that were dismissed. One was for stopping payment on a check b/c merchant delivered broken goods. Went to court judge ordered me to pay the amount of the check to the merchant, and the merchant had to deliver working goods. After that was done, judge dismissed.

Other misdemeanor was an as--ult charge. Where I live Sheriff can file without grand jury and did. Judge ruled no probable cause at initial hearing and threw it out with prejudice after admonishing the Sheriff and DA for wasting the courts time.

Fidelity, UBS, Chase had no issues, Merrill and USAA did.

USAA has a policy that all new roles are in office. Remote employees that post for new roles must move to an office location if they want a new role. It also has a policy that all roles are posted for at least 5 business days. This does not appear to apply to all people. Good ole boys get special treatment. The bank just hired a new chief compliance officer and the role was not posted. The new chief compliance officer is also remote and does not appear to have moved to an office location. What gives? Why is there special treatment for certain people while the rest of us remote employees are stuck in our roles unless we are willing to move?

They are hiding Compliance and other areas of Corporate Risk headcount numbers from regulators.

We remain unethical and shady.

Has anyone noticed that the new FAQs about time tracking don't state punishments for low compliance?

A new job has been posted, they are looking to hire someone to develop AI to take processes, procedures, analysis, etc out of the hands of current workers and into the bowels of AI. The worst part is that the job description includes making the AI in compliance with audit standards and SOX public standards. All while following the rules of controls and separation of duties? How can this be taken seriously? Trusting that data is properly handled, accounting is done up to high standards, and that our financial statements are accurate in the hands of newly developed AI? More layoffs coming to FP&A if this job gets filled? Whoever takes this job will be a yes-man and completely wreck our financial accuracy.