#culture

Can you guys stop complaining? It’s making the directors, VP, and the CEOs friends uncomfortable!

Anyone who applied for a position, but then didn’t get it-yet there is evidence of a friend, family remember, or just “someone I know” who got the job-you can file with the EOC. Chronyism is illegal in this circumstance. Easy to prove-just look up their profile on linked-in, true people, or do an internet search. Screen shot the evidence. This applies to internal and external applicants.

Just su-k it up already! You can’t get paid your incentive checks on time so that the money can go to the top dawgs.

If you make them a ton of revenue, they will fly to your location and cook you a piece of chicken. Congrats! Smile! Get back in your food line! They might even splurge and buy you a $20 trophy or print a piece of paper that says you did good.

Definition:
Cronyism—favoring friends or associates for jobs or contracts regardless of merit—is often not inherently illegal in the private sector, but it is prohibited in government and high-stakes sectors to prevent corruption, conflict of interest, and discrimination. It is deemed illegal when it violates fair hiring laws, creates hostile work environments, or involves unlawful government quid pro quo.
The Law Dictionary
The Law Dictionary
+4
Here is why cronyism is illegal or heavily restricted:
Public Trust and Corruption: In government, appointing cronies violates public trust, breaks transparency, and often leads to illegal corruption where contracts are awarded to unqualified allies.
Discrimination Laws: While hiring a friend isn't illegal, it becomes unlawful if that favoritism is based on protected characteristics like race, religion, gender, or age, creating a discriminatory hiring process.
Contract and Liability Risks: In business, cronyism can lead to illegal "hostile work environment" claims or breach of contract if established hiring procedures were bypassed to hire a friend.
Economic Inefficiency: It restricts economic growth by prioritizing political connections over innovation and skill, often violating anti-trust or fair competition laws (crony capitalism).
Instagram
Instagram
+7
In short, while "playing favorites" is generally legal, it becomes illegal when it crosses into discrimination, public corruption, or violates employment law.

But having an interview for another job so loud everyone can hear you.

Ba--s!

I think he nailed it, too.

It always amazes me how people believe in the doom! The doom scrolling!

"March 26 CONFIRMED" Yeah right!

We're all in agreement to only work 4/5 days a week and only put forth 80% effort right? for those who havent quiet quit already please do so and stop taking this job seriously. stop slacking ppl, stop scheduling meetings, just ktlo because that is exactly what kkr and elt are doing.

https://www.inc.com/jessica-stillman/people-who-love-corporate-bs-are-bad-at-their-jobs-new-cornell-research-confirms/91314405

Will HR make him send an email with an official apology or will 3000 RND employees be quietly told to ignore him? Either way confidence is lost.

He fired the testers causing an explosion in escaped bugs. BH apologed for him.

His rolling reorg has slowed work so badly that he thinks T-TH will fix the mess he made. Will the reorg ever be code complete?

He put US RND teams under the direction of an inexperienced director in another country with a 5 hour time difference. How does that help in person innovation?

He split Viya 3.5 and 4.0 RND teams putting them in competition ki-ling any chance for a smooth customer upgrade.

He has not developed one working GenAI SAS model after two years of trying.

He gave up a 19 point lead in the NCAA tournament.

Anything else?

DXC promotes a poor performance culture.
If you do a great job there is no benefit to you. That then encourages the person to either leave or wind down their performance.
The poor performer only has to avoid a poor 3 rating. Just do enough... They will never leave.
You are left with a pool of poor performers..

Yes, I am “safe” but I am sick to my stomach how all this was handled but yet nothing in the news. This should be all over the news, FIS should be on a shame of wall for the way they handled things! Please someone who was affected…please call the news!

I can’t confirm whether every rumor going around is true, but I can speak to what many of us see and feel inside the team. There’s a clear sense of favoritism and decisions that don’t always seem based on merit.
It’s also concerning to watch the CEO receive multimillion‑dollar compensation while work is being sent overseas, reducing local opportunities and creating even more uncertainty for employees.
This isn’t about attacking anyone or repeating unverified claims. It’s about pointing out a culture where some people protect each other while others are left vulnerable, which naturally creates distrust and discourages those who work with integrity.
Fair leadership should focus on transparency, equity, and real accountability.

I have an odd question, and I'm not sure who to take it to. I've been with my team for about 10 months, we're spread all over the U.S. and a fairly small team. I have no one with me in the office I report to. I've noticed that questions about projects we're engaged with do not seem to be welcomed. I almost feel like I'm getting a sigh and an eye roll or a curt non answer when I ask them. In my defense, these are all ad hoc projects, and not like there are documented procedures I can refer to in order to answer for myself and the initial instructions given are always scant and haphazard. The no questions thing is just not a culture I'm used to and I'm wondering if there's any insight or suggestions.

If you ever needed proof that ethical leadership is the load‑bearing pillar of any functioning organization — especially one trying to execute strategy or implement AI — look no further than the heralded halls of 240G. It serves as a cautionary tale carved into the ruins of a once‑stable institution: the pillars are cracking, the principles are eroding, and leadership is standing beneath the rubble insisting everything is “on track.”

Ethical leadership is supposed to be the foundation that holds up culture, trust, and long‑term strategy. Without it, the entire structure becomes a hollow monument — impressive from a distance, but one strong gust of “cost optimization” away from collapse. And according to current and recent leadership experience, that gust arrives at least once per quarter.

In a healthy organization, leaders model integrity, transparency, and accountability. In the version described on this site, leadership treats principles like decorative columns: nice to look at, but purely ornamental. They talk about values while quietly chiseling away at them by their own examples. They praise employees for resilience while removing the very supports that make resilience possible. They speak of transformation as if it’s a noble journey, not a slow demolition of institutional memory.

This is where AI enters the picture — and where the absence of ethical leadership may become catastrophic.

AI can be a powerful tool for strategy execution, but only if guided by leaders who understand its impact on people, processes, and culture.

Without ethics, AI becomes a mechanized wrecking ball: efficient, emotionless, and devastatingly precise.
Imagine an AI trained on the behaviors described on this site by our current and former associates. It would:
• Automate layoffs with the enthusiasm of a demolition crew
• Flag “low engagement” as a structural defect
• Recommend replacing experience with cheaper concrete
• Generate leadership messages that say nothing but sound inspirational

Strategy execution cannot survive in a culture where the pillars are cracking and leadership keeps insisting the dust clouds are “a sign of progress.” AI certainly can’t.

The truth is simple:
You cannot build a sustainable future on eroded principles.
Not with strategy.
Not with AI.
Not with any amount of corporate spin.

Ethical leadership isn’t optional — it’s the only thing preventing the entire structure from collapsing on the people still holding it up.

You’re not viewed as an investment, you’re treated as a cost to be managed. That distinction is intentional. This isn’t leadership, it’s management in its most short-sighted form.

There’s no real vision here - only a fixation on near-term optics and personal gain. Anyone outside of that inner circle is reduced to a line item, something to optimize or eliminate in service of short-term efficiency metrics. The broader, long-term impact simply isn’t part of the equation.

They understand the job market dynamics. They know there’s a steady pipeline of applicants. That knowledge reinforces a mindset where people are interchangeable and, ultimately, expendable. It removes any incentive to invest in talent, develop people, or build something durable.

The cost-cutting decisions they make carry little immediate consequence for them personally, since they’re insulated from the actual work and its downstream effects. But those same decisions generate immediate, tangible upside for themselves, whether in compensation, perception, or internal positioning.

So the system sustains itself: extract value now, defer consequences, and treat people as replaceable inputs rather than assets worth investing in.

talking to friends in several departments and noticing a trend of some managers and directors using the current uncertainty and fear and they are taking advantage of having a longer leash than usual. i.e. the difficult ahole you try to avoid has somehow become an even bigger ahole and its going unchecked.

Accountability feels like it's going one direction lately when it comes to professionalism and borderline workplace abuse. to make things worse, some "leaders" are aware that it's hard for staff to even flag these management behavior issues when the company is already in crisis mode and we are all just trying to keep our heads down so we can keep paying rent and put food on the table.

I saw something that never would fly in any other workplace setting and people are either too concerned to cause issues or they are so beaten down they dont bother.

Hard to stay focused as it is. Some of these people in leadership roles are past professional training and need to be held accountable. if you're in a role where you can report things without getting into trouble, do it. that problematic and unbalanced dipsh-t becomes weakened when people come forward together.

If you haven't visited this site (WallStreetDiscriminates.com) you need to. Post to the site if you have a story to share. I'm working on drafting mine. Using these info from Forbes: Women account for roughly 30% to 35% of workplace bullies. Women bullies target women approximately 65% to 68% of the time, which is almost twice the rate that men bully women in the workforce. Workplace bullying : repeated mistreatment that can include verbal abuse, social exclusion, humiliation, and work sabotage.

Maybe that'll finally force leadership to step up their game and actually run the business instead of just extracting wealth.

The atmosphere changed after the layoffs became the norm and it hasn't come back. People are hesitant to speak up, to take initiative, and to trust. I keep waiting for things to feel normal again, but they never do. It's no surprise, though, since we all know more layoffs are always a possibility.

A rare sensible move, if true.

Fidelity appears to have made a business decision long ago in response to shrinking margins, automation, fee compression, and a more self-directed investor base. The problem isn’t the decision itself. It’s how that decision has been operationalized.
When a firm replaces professional judgment with opaque performance systems, “standards of care” stops being a value and starts being a slogan. The micro-management intensifies by design. Weekly one-on-ones. Additional check-ins. Maybe a "visit" from a market leader. More oversight framed as “support.” More and more metrics, but less trust.
I experienced this firsthand. It became a slow, unsettling realization that doing the right thing for clients and doing the right thing for the system were no longer the same thing. That tension doesn’t resolve, it accumulates. Over time, it wears you down. (Which I gather is the objective of a constructive discharge.)
Some people resign. Others try to hang on, only to find their work increasingly scrutinized, their judgment second-guessed, and their margin for error shrinking to zero.
It can be soul-crushing. (Which I think is the idea.) For those living it, the cost isn’t just professional, it’s personal.
Best wishes to everyone currently navigating that reality. If its any consolation, what that environment erodes isn’t talent, it’s morale and morale can be rebuilt quickly once you’re no longer inside a system designed to grind it down.

Bumped from @cf+1kh0ce72y, an on-point post.

Another issue, another meeting where leadership sits back while someone from our level gets asked to explain. The people who made the decision are once again nowhere to be found. It's always the same: blame rolls downhill and we're at the bottom. I hate it here.

Like others said, it’s just another way to get booted later. Je-king us around.

When did omnissa last paid 100% of the bonus? They just keep disrespecting whoever has decided to stay loyal to them the last year

What are the thoughts behind this transition? Do you think this is go move or bad move? What are the rumors on how quota is going to be and if we are getting a comp increase decrease or change to salary? Just any more information about this transition would be appreciated. Crazy times right now at Verizon.

The culture has shifted dramatically in the last two years. Managers with zero experience are making decisions that make no sense. You're not allowed to question anything or suggest better ways. The culture has turned from bad to worse. Every day I'm trying to find a way out. I think many here are in the similar boat.

https://fortune.com/2026/03/24/centene-ceo-sarah-london-health-care-insurance-trump-medicaid/

Fortune just dropped a fluff piece on Sarah London. It’s a masterclass in fluffy bootlicking. How much did the company pay for this pile of trash?

They call her a "mission-driven" savior fighting for Medicaid. Ba-f!

Let’s start with the photo. It’s awful. She looks completely dead in the eyes. There is zero warmth. Zero humanity. Just the cold, vacant stare of someone who fires thousands of people and then complains to CNBC about her "stressful schedule."

Fortune gushes over her "social impact" goals. They forgot to mention her $20M paycheck, while the company posted a $6.7 billion net loss last year.

She isn't driven by a mission. She’s driven by a massive bonus while her company burns and she runs MFN's legacy into the ground.

She's just a Layoff Queen who talks about "operating discipline." That’s corporate-speak for firing people. We all painfully know how many thousands of lives she's ruined with her inept leadership and lack of strategy. No amount of glowing praise from "Culture Karen" can redeem her.

"London Calling" started her career in Hollywood. It shows. She isn't a healthcare executive. She’s a storyteller. A pretty face with a vacant stare. This is just her latest script. She talks about "affordable housing" to distract from the fact that her business model relies on denying care and firing the people who do the actual work.

She is the ultimate corporate grifter. High on rhetoric. Low on ethics. Exceptionally well-compensated for failure. She isn't fighting for Medicaid. She isn't fighting for her employees. She’s fighting for her next glossy magazine profile. I've never seen anyone fail upwards so well.

Sad to see how nice the Adidas WC jerseys look compared to ours. Is this a continued sign we are going down?

Every layoff targets the skilled workers who keep things running, and somehow the managers who do nothing but attend meetings never seem to get touched. No wonder our performance keeps sliding.

Real leaders own their mistakes. Ours just deflect and hide. The people running this place have no clue what they're doing and we're the ones paying for it every single day.

Anything happening yet?

It's becoming impossible to ignore the fact that certain people get access to opportunities the rest of us don't even know exist, not to mention are considered for. It's always the same names for every good project, every interesting assignment. I guess hard work doesn't matter if you're not in the right group.

Every week my job drifts a little further from what I was actually hired to do. At this point I’m basically in a completely different role, and nobody’s said a word about it. No conversation, no training, no change to my title or pay. I’ve brought it up, and nothing changes. What even is this place?

Have you ever worked for a company that constantly works against you being productive? Not just not helpful, actively makes it harder and harder to do your job? For the stock’s sake, I hope something changes.

A thread to discuss the DP town hall and observations:

This townhall stood out from the usual scripted updates—it felt more real, direct, and intentional. Instead of just showcasing achievements or high-level strategy, this one leaned into transparency, addressing ground realities. The tone was more candid and less corporate, which made the message land better. It didn’t feel like a one-way presentation; it felt like a reset—aligning everyone on priorities, expectations and the need to execute better. Overall, it felt like a signal that leadership is aware, engaged, and possibly gearing up for change.

What actually is this ?! ELT trying to cause a panic or failing at slapstick?

Looks like another 90 minutes of time waste is upon us... Here is what is going to be said:

1) We are awesome (according to our own selves of course).
2) We are winning against Microsoft and Citrix (again according to our selves).
3) Our customers love us (that's why they are leaving us, you see...).
4) Our technology is so futuristic (hence why we brought the 70s back in our SKO).

BTW %73.67 of you clicked on the phishing email that was sent the other day so you now have to take the wrath of big man DD and explain to him why you did not fight harder against the temptation to click on the URL.

The title explains but what has your experience been with him?

They are answering their own BS questions... Not a single question from the audience. And I have never heard such absolute nonsense, complete gibberish

I’ve been here awhile, I see VP/SVP’s all of a sudden posting pictures of themselves with their teams on LinkedIn at their self-indulging little town hall meetings “look at me”, “I’m great”, “don’t fire me”.

Meanwhile, they have been here for decades, never worked anywhere else. Let me fill you in, you’re not the solution, you are the problem so save us your vanity posts and how much you miraculously now know about AI or Verizon Customers. lol

Heard about BCC from Sourcing town hall. Is this 3M saying they will hire and replace in these cheap labor markets? Is this the strategy, hire in OUS and EXPECT US government contracts and customers to ignore? Celebrating US250 this year, shouldn’t this be highlighted and treated accordingly? Maybe I don’t know 3M history well yet, but seems like a giant finger to US and its workers while trying to hide it and simply say they are global.

RTO 3/4 days a week: some managers in Risk are not enforcing it, letting their good butt buddy cronies slide. Why bother commuting for nothing but Teams meetings, when the guy next to me is getting a pass?

Wells Fargo is no longer a meritocracy, its a cronyocracy.