#automation

Many U.S. businesses anticipate job reductions in July. WARN filings indicate a more careful hiring trend. Technology, cloud services, and manufacturing firms are most affected. Companies cite automation, artificial intelligence, and efficiency as driving factors. The overall job market appears stable, yet growth is becoming uneven.

https://www.newsweek.com/list-of-companies-laying-off-employees-in-july-12128209

Sitting here reading my job duties and how much of it as an IE is being replaced. I think the next roll of layoffs is going to be because positions like mine are being taken over by AI . I mean each couple of months I have less and less work due to it being automated . So, I think we are going to see this more and more throughout Texas Instruments but also probably the industry .I think this is where the next layoffs will be aimed

Ford is rehiring veteran engineers to fix quality problems created by Ford's rush to implement AI/automation (admitted by their VP of vehicle hardware engineering - Charles Po-n). Oops, duh. At least they recognize the problem and how to address it. As an aside, building an already designed vehicle has got to be more "automatable" than designing a cell site and the even more "thinking/thoughtful" part - walking that project through all of the issues that pop up from the initial design through turn up.

https://www.businessinsider.com/ford-ai-hiring-veteran-engineers-2026-6

You can Google it I'm not posting a link.

I got a crack out of the article. CEOs should tell us more about how they're moving jobs overseas, decimating the workforce with AI, while accepting larger and larger bonuses.

• A significant shift in sentiment has made the job of running a company tougher, with CEOs complaining they are overworked, overstressed and subjected to endless scrutiny.
  The rise of political populism and volatile shifts in trade policy have contributed to the decline in admiration for CEOs, with polls showing they are no longer as admired as they once were.*

Rob decided Ai was better than Humans? I heard there have been lay offs in favor of Ai.

Elastic, a data-search company, plans to lay off approximately 281 workers. This decision aims to reduce operational complexity. Executives cite AI automation as a key factor. The company still expects net headcount growth. This growth is projected for the current fiscal year.

San Francisco, California

https://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/news/2026/06/24/elastic-layoffs-ai-search.html

Job losses due to implementation of AI is coming soon .

Ford recall wave hits 387,000 vehicles amid record NHTSA alerts
Massive Ford re-recall: Over 387,000 Ford vehicles are being recalled again for safety issues, covering multiple popular models and repeat defects.

Record recall pace: NHTSA has logged more than 300 recalls in 2026 so far, with Ford, Jeep, Honda, and others facing major safety campaigns.

Owner impact rising: Even free repairs can mean lost work time, transport hassles, and resale concerns, especially under do-not-drive warnings.

https://gmauthority.com/blog/2026/06/uaw-blasts-gm-for-installing-robots-on-factory-zero-assembly-line/

This isn't "efficiency helping workers." It's using AI to shrink the human side of the business while squeezing the remaining people harder. Classic corporate playbook: Automate repetitive tasks → reduce headcount/support → demand more output from fewer (or worse-paid) humans → call it progress.
AI does boost productivity. But pretending it won't displace or devalue roles — especially when contracts are being rewritten to reflect exactly that — is corporate gaslighting. State Farm isn't the only one doing this, but their "Good Neighbor" branding makes the disconnect especially glaring.

Reference - https://www.hcamag.com/au/specialisation/hr-technology/all-our-human-developers-could-be-replaced-by-ai-within-a-few-years-sap-boss/579647

Statement of intent which will be moved towards gradual actions!

The very same thing Oasis does can be produced out of the box on most AI platforms.

ChatGPT / Claude premium offers numerous agents now built in click and go type that do many things that needed a manual agent build.

You literally type into chat monitor this server for Xyz and set triggers conditions and it does it for you.

DXC don’t have the resources these AI companies have…. Which bell end thought clients would pay us millions for this?

Watch for more "savings" coming. . .

https://www.wsj.com/video/how-ibm-saved-45-billion-using-ai/C3EDE5AB-F38B-4281-8A92-0421C8753129

By: WSJ Leadership Institute
49 min. ago

IBM senior vice president of marketing and communications Jonathan Adashek explains the company's "client zero" initiative, which utilized artificial intelligence and automation to cut $4.5 billion in spending over three years. The IBM executive also explains how the technology is freeing up creative teams from menial tasks and generating more targeted sales leads.

It was a fun ride while it lasted but time to go. I was on the Automation/Remainco side and don’t have faith in that team to set any sort of real strategy. (“Launch more NPIs” is not a strategy) For those sticking around, best of luck in the coming Hunger Games! I hope you like eating curry.

Our is going no where fast. Promised returns and automation delayed. We always seem to be getting different results from the same prompt. Still. AML part is going to be pushed live, fake it til you make it right?

I bet the corporation is going full on AI where UR and Care Coordination Nurses will be replaced. Instead of paying $70,000 + benefits to nurses. It is cheaper to use AI that work 24/7, no sick time, no PTO, no health benefits.
I can tell you l have seen AI approve claims and misread the clinical criteria that should have been denied. It will actually end up costing the corpration more money loss in the long run.
I see it on a daily basis.

As MB sent a letter to his org 3 hours ago, the era of unlimited tokens is officially over in Oracle. Well, didn't last long and they already threw in a towel, starting rolling out on Monday from AI department of all places.
Everybody will be assigned a weekly limit. I guess we will see on Monday what is the limit.

I think it's a very bad sign, even Oracle lost confidence and this AI bubble is coming to an end very fast. They just now treat it as an expensive limited resource to augment productivity, no pipe dreams of full automation and some revolution. Energy cost grounded this whole thing very quickly.

We need to be using more AI to trim cost here at T. We are going backwards if we don’t.

UPS announced a significant workforce reduction. The logistics giant is downsizing by 20,000 people. This includes closing various facilities. The company is aggressively moving towards automated hubs. This shift is part of a move away from Amazon.

https://www.aol.com/articles/17-big-layoffs-know-130513000.html

How close are they to the dream of everyone below certain levels being replaced by AI or completely replaced via labor arbitrage?

A rough % is enough.

General Motors is adding cobots to its Factory Zero. These collaborative robots are being introduced in Detroit. The factory previously experienced significant layoffs. The United Auto Workers union is expressing displeasure. UAW's concern stems from the automation and job impact.

Detroit, Michigan

https://www.crainsdetroit.com/manufacturing-logistics/automotive/cdb-gm-cobots-rankle-uaw-20260616/

https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/gallery/2026/6/11/photos-indias-workers-are-training-ai-robots-to-take-their-jobs

With a smartphone strapped to her head, Indian housewife Nagireddy Sriramyachandra films herself slicing mangoes to train artificial intelligence-powered robots to take on household tasks in the future.

Earning 250 rupees ($2.6) for one hour of video, her mundane recordings are invaluable for global tech companies teaching machines how to move like humans in the real world.

Has anyone heard of any future layoffs for Benefit Verification or Prior Auth reps?
It seems like Health100 is being made to take over the majority of our work.

Verizon Replacing Its Customer Service Personnel With AI Has Turned Live Chat Queries Into Low-Quality ChatGPT-Like Replies, Enraging Customers.

We’re only moving forward with automated eligibility for their DSNP plan you won’t have a role anymore.

Appreciate your business over the years.

We all know it's coming and we know they'll do anything to cut labor as much as possible. All of us here have an expiration date.

Here is a polished, punchy version of your post that keeps the aggressive, anti-AI edge and focuses entirely on the economic strategy to break the system:

If you genuinely hate AI, now is the time to band together and ensure it never becomes permanently embedded in your work life.
The strategy is simple: Use Copilot for anything and everything, no matter how small.

Why? Because right now, the costs are heavily subsidized. GitHub has already started shifting toward metered billing, meaning every single prompt costs tons of tokens. By this time next year, full-blown model access will be completely unsustainable for corporate budgets because of how expensive it actually is to run.

We are already starting to see Copilot throw "too busy to respond" errors. Keep pushing it. Keep up the volume. The current pricing model is a house of cards, and if we maximize consumption, the technology becomes completely unfeasible to maintain at the rate we're paying.

PS: this post was generated using Kroger copilot. Fire me

I have a PhD for 20 years now and most of my papers are in AI. I worked for 5 years at Fiserv as a product director before I left! This lady keeps referring to AI, but she is simply talking about workflow and automation. This is not AI. Can someone please educated her? Is she just another Gibbons?

Snowflake's CIO made a notable statement. He indicated using layoffs as a strategy. This was to persuade employees to utilize AI. The company aims for increased AI adoption. This move highlights a focus on technological integration.

https://www.theinformation.com/newsletters/applied-ai/snowflake-cio-says-used-layoffs-convince-staff-use-ai

Siemens Management Call Today discussed massive layoffs coming through 2027 upwards of 20,000 employees globally. Massive restructuring underway for all business segments through 2028. Divestment of many areas due to AI adaptation and automation.

I’ve noticed that leaders keep pushing for AI when we actually need more automation. AI is not deterministic and is a struggle to implement. If they want correct answers 100% of the time, why not implement automations instead? Makes no sense…

Canon global is artificially propping up the stock value with huge buybacks at the end of May and throughout June. They did the exact same in the 2 months right before the RIF bloodbath in early July 2024.

If CUSA leadership is planning another wave of consolidations—particularly targeting specialized or manual internal roles to make way for the automated, U.S.-based remanufacturing model, the post-July 4th window (specifically between July 6 and July 20, 2026) is the exact historical and operational sweet spot.

If you're trying to gauge the temperature in your department over the next few weeks, watch for mid-June invites to "organizational alignment" meetings, sudden, quiet audits of your division’s specific workflow volumes, or any mentions from direct managers of "proof of life" for your department to rationalize its value.

Take your books and go small / independent while you can. HO will say the AI tools are to help you but they are studying you and will automate you. They watch your habits and clients closely and are making FA agents now. They will squeeze the ranks, push you into team offices, make you use AI, build client relationship with the team generally over you personally, and push you out gradually. They think a new hire with AI can do your job for much less pay. That’s the plan.

Is it true that we might have more layoffs this year or next? I heard that automatic robots are coming to the distribution centers and more jobs going to South America and India are still going down. A high hat in ops. heard it from one of the bosses in securety when he helped him with a violent person problem in his market and then told my boss. He said he told him he is asking for a bigger team . Is that for real or did my boss not understand it right? My boss is always right on what he hears. I’m stressing. Are any of you hearing the same?

AI is making many mistakes, especially in testing and validation. In many organizations, employees are becoming overly dependent on AI and are gradually losing fundamental problem-solving skills. AI is a tool, not a complete solution. Without strong domain knowledge and fundamentals, AI-generated results can be inaccurate and sometimes create bigger issues than they solve.

Many companies are rushing to automate everything with AI, but blindly trusting AI outputs can lead to costly mistakes, rework, and quality problems. In addition, the increasing use of AI models results in higher token consumption, growing infrastructure costs, and expensive subscription fees.

The most effective approach is to use AI as an assistant while keeping experienced employees involved in critical thinking, verification, testing, and decision-making. Human expertise combined with AI is far more valuable than relying entirely on AI.

Standard Chartered plans to cut more than 15% of its corporate function workforce by 2030 as it expands the use of AI and automation across the bank. The restructuring could eliminate more than 7K jobs globally, affecting back-office and support functions. Standard Chartered currently employs around 80K people worldwide and operates extensively across Asia, Africa, and the Middle East.

CEO Bill Winters said the reductions will be driven by automation and wider adoption of artificial intelligence. The bank expects some employees to be reskilled, but the overall direction is clear: fewer human workers will be needed as AI takes over routine operational tasks. The announcement comes as Standard Chartered raises its long-term profitability targets, aiming for returns above 15% by 2028 and 18% by 2030. Investors appear to support the strategy, with shares moving higher following the announcement.

This is another example of a growing trend across large corporations. AI is no longer being positioned solely as a productivity tool. It is increasingly being used to reduce headcount and streamline operations.

For employees in banking, finance, operations, compliance, risk support, HR, and other corporate functions, the question is becoming harder to ignore:

If a global bank can eliminate 7,000 jobs through automation, how many similar roles across the industry could disappear over the next decade?

Thoughts from current or former Standard Chartered employees?

Phoenix has been a major hub for low-paid office jobs. These cubicle-based roles included customer service and data entry. Such jobs provided a path to the middle class for many workers. Now, offshoring and artificial intelligence are causing these jobs to disappear. Thousands of local workers in Phoenix face an uncertain employment future.

https://www.wsj.com/economy/phoenix-built-an-empire-of-cubicle-jobs-ai-is-coming-to-tear-it-down-fb64bb68

I mean, once AI gets exposed as an overhyped, expensive, hallucinating toy?

How much more do you think the company will shut down with GTP coming online?

Survey reveals that 99% of CEOs now expect AI-driven layoffs — companies are racing to replace junior workers with AI, even as many executives remain uncertain about the returns on AI investments | Tom's Hardware

Survey reveals that 99% of CEOs now expect AI-driven layoffs — companies are racing to replace junior workers with AI, even as many executives remain uncertain about the returns on AI investments

A recent study by consulting firm Mercer has revealed that an unprecedented 99% of CEOs envision AI-driven layoffs in the short term. The survey, which covered 12,000 C-suite executives, HR leaders, employees, and investors, showed that an overwhelming majority of executives expect AI "to lead to at least some headcount reduction in the next two years." At the same time, work and economic anxiety are increasing among employees, while workplace well-being has plummeted, with the portion of workers reporting that they "feel good at work" dropping from 66% in 2024 to just 44%.

The report also revealed that young professionals, aged 22 to 27, face the highest risk of job displacement as CEOs target simple tasks that typically served to train new hires. Because generative AI excels at codifiable, routine entry-level tasks, companies are slowing down traditional junior hiring pipelines. Standard Chartered recently announced plans to cut 7,000 jobs to replace ‘lower-value human capital’ and focus on automation.

Confirming the trend is another report from the consulting firm Oliver Wyman, based on a global survey of CEOs. The Oliver Wyman report revealed that the number of companies actively reducing junior/entry-level roles spiked from 17% to 43% in a single year due to automation.

Whether massive AI adoption and the resulting trends are worth it remains to be seen. Around 40,000 tech industry employees lost their jobs in the first quarter of 2026. Despite such trends, the Mercer report found that only 32% of surveyed executives believe their companies can effectively combine human labor with AI systems, even as they heavily push for AI to maximize return on investment.

Oliver Wyman’s report shows that AI was a top-three priority for most CEOs, with more 90% confirming the deployment or intention to deploy AI in their companies. Conversely, more than 50% say they can’t yet tell whether this AI deployment is actually delivering on the expected productivity gains.

A mere 27% of CEOs said the return on AI investment had actually met or exceeded expectations, down from 38% the previous year. Nearly 25% said they had seen absolutely no impact on revenue. The report suggests that the realities of redesigning entire workflows may be curbing AI enthusiasm, even as the worrisome trends continue.

While massive corporations like Amazon, Accenture, and Meta continue to announce thousands of job cuts tied to automation, macroeconomic data reveal a more complex narrative. Data highlighted by Fortune shows that automation-driven layoffs have frequently failed to deliver promised financial returns or measurable productivity gains.

Another interesting narrative is an AI smokescreen. Reports from labor analysts like Challenger, Gray & Christmas indicate that while AI is the most frequently cited reason for job cuts, many experts believe tech CEOs are using AI as a smokescreen to mask deeper internal struggles, corrections to overhiring, and shifts toward outsourcing.

In many ways, the reports paint a picture of a corporate world charging headfirst into an AI transformation it barely understands. Companies are cutting entry-level roles that traditionally trained the next generation of workers, even as many executives privately admit they still cannot prove the technology delivers meaningful returns. If the trend continues, an entire generation could find itself shut out of the traditional career pipeline altogether — trapped in a labor market that increasingly demands experience while simultaneously eliminating the jobs designed to provide it.

Proponents argue that humanity as a whole has always emerged unscathed and better off after massive technological revolutions, despite initial fears and shake-ups. On the other hand, opponents argue that a zoomed-in view of the actual impact such changes have is necessary for ethical implementation. We recently reported that a Chinese court ruled that companies cannot replace workers simply because “AI can do a better job.”

https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/survey-reveals-that-99-percent-of-ceos-now-expect-ai-driven-layoffs-companies-are-racing-to-replace-junior-workers-with-ai-even-as-many-executives-remain-uncertain-about-the-returns-on-ai-investments