#leadership

Must say...so many layoffs came and went....there are cosmetic layoff's in his empire but nothing significant. All his directs are still there. It can't be his or his directs' performance..none of them have any kind of pedigree in real data work. The whole thing is a house built on cards that will collapse when there is a proper regulatory exam under a proper administration.
Tim Ryan must be one helluva godfather

So the legal lady comes in to clean up the mess after CG doesn't "do the right thing." But the whole function is worse than ever. What gives? Where is the talent brains and skill in the org spending all this $$$? Are we really going to win this way?

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-06-10/xbox-plans-significant-layoffs-as-it-transforms-under-new-ceo-asha-sharma

Ole Danny boy is quickly becoming the laughing stock among tech leaders because he’s so over his head about AI. He thinks he’s a leader in the space, and it’s hilarious to read commentaries, feedback, opinions about him that point out his misguided beliefs and his totally wrong view of AI. It’s honestly embarrassing and I know the C-Suite in several large corporations and sitting back building war chests to buy out parts of Verizon once he fully flops and drives the company to its knees. I meet with C-Suite level in multiple companies through consulting contracts, and I can tell you 100% that Dan is the punchline of the joke, but he’s too arrogant and/or stupid to see it.

So, finally, it happened.

First, I want to thank Piotr S. for doing what almost nobody else had the courage to do — breaking the silence and speaking the truth. In that moment, you showed more humanity, more integrity, and honestly more leadership than an entire room full of executives combined.

But maybe expecting anything else was naive.

What can you really expect from a CEO and a C-Suite whose success is measured by stock price and shareholder applause? When your stock-based compensation is worth $7.1 million, finding ways to squeeze another 5-6% out of the stock probably feels more important than the lives of the people behind the numbers. And apparently, one of the easiest ways to do that is simple: sacrifice employees. Works like a charm.

And just like that, a 10-12 year organization disappeared.

3M GSC wasn't perfect, but it was built by thousands of hours of hard work, dedication, late nights, friendships, shared struggles, and people who genuinely cared. Overnight, it was dissolved. Why? Nobody really knows. We were told it's a "transition."

God, these people love transitions.

I'm already imagining the next shareholder presentation:

"Expanding AI capabilities."
"Driving efficiencies."
"Transforming the operating model."

Corporate bingo at its finest.

Then came the management communication. Pre-recorded videos. Carefully scripted messages. Smiling faces. Words that somehow lasted several minutes while saying absolutely nothing.

People left those meetings still wondering:

"Am I staying at 3M?"
"Am I moving to Genpact?"
"Why me?"
"Why not someone else?"

No answers. No transparency. No logic.

Just confusion.

The most impressive achievement of the day was probably making thousands of people more confused after a communication session than before it.

A place that grew, evolved, and achieved things people were proud of. Today, we're left with leaders who seem more interested in protecting themselves and pleasing their bosses than protecting their people.

The irony is almost painful.

Some of the people being pushed out today are literally in Warsaw representing 3M at Women in Tech.

Others are leaders in Pride communities.

Others spent years building Employee Experience programs, WLN initiatives, Belonging Teams, clubs, events, volunteering activities, engagement campaigns.

They were the smiling faces in the videos.

The people holding the 3M logo.

The people proudly telling everyone that this was a Great Place To Work.

Seven years in a row.

LOL.

What a joke that slogan feels today.

Many of those same people are now being told they no longer belong.

Years of effort.

Years of loyalty.

Years of believing the company values.

All erased by a spreadsheet.

Management keeps telling people what they think their managers want to hear. Managers tell leaders what they think leaders want to hear. Everyone protects themselves. Everyone avoids uncomfortable truths. The cycle continues.

And the people at the bottom pay the price.

Today many of us feel less like employees and more like livestock being traded between corporations. Packaged up. Sold off. Handed over. No ownership. No accountability. No one willing to stand up and say:

"Yes. This was our decision."

Just another transition.

Another restructuring.

Another corporate success story for the next earnings call.

So with that, goodbye GSC.

Goodbye to the friendships.

Goodbye to the memories.

Goodbye to the culture that thousands of people spent years building.

Whatever happens next, nobody can take away what this place once was.

May the memories never fade.

❤️ Goodbye.

Lee Raymond’s Famous Quotes on Employee Performance at ExxonMobil

Lee Raymond, CEO of ExxonMobil from 1999 to 2005, was known for his strong emphasis on merit-based systems, hard work, and the role of competition in driving performance. While he did not publish a single “employee performance” manifesto, several of his public statements reflect his philosophy on how people should be rewarded and motivated in business.

Key quotes related to performance and merit:

“The market system requires that people be committed and willing to work hard. Inherent with that is what I call a merit system, which I think gives people the greatest opportunity.”

This statement underscores his belief that performance should be tied to effort and results, with merit being the primary driver of advancement and rewards.

“The main professional responsibility of a person in business is business. He or she must be successful in economic terms, but always within an ethical framework.”

Raymond stressed that business success—measured by performance and profitability—is the core duty, with ethics as a guiding constraint weheartquotes.com.

“It is important to remember that all business has an impact on the lives of real people.”
This reflects his view that performance should be evaluated not just on numbers, but also on its tangible effects on people and communities weheartquotes.com.

“Ethical conduct is something that becomes inherent in an organization over a long period of time.”

While not directly about performance metrics, this implies that a culture of integrity supports sustainable, high-performing organizations weheartquotes.com.

Overall philosophy:

Raymond’s approach to employee performance was rooted in a meritocratic, results-oriented mindset. He believed that hard work, competition, and measurable success were the keys to both personal advancement and organizational success, while maintaining ethical standards as a foundation.

If you need a concise summary for a presentation or discussion, you could frame it as:

“At ExxonMobil, we reward those who are committed, willing to work hard, and deliver results—within an ethical framework. Merit, not favoritism, should be the standard for performance.”

All levels of leaders are gonna be cut. Anyone know when?

I can't believe something like that is happening in freaking 2026. They don't even try to pretend they care anymore, they're just playing A RECORDED VIDEO with announcement basically saying "fu-k you all". Don't we at least deserve a stupid standard teams call with any possibility to speak up?????? #GSCPL

Link dropped in our emails. Let him have it.

Mike Lyons gets 70 million in year one while cutting staff, forgoing bonuses or salary increases for many if not all, stating market and company talking points around why they cannot spend money. All while taking 70 million 😂

Incredible leadership. Just who everyone wants to follow!

So leadership has changed but the new CISO is someone who just can't stop talking. Sheesh...

The most alarming number in the Wall Street Journal’s “Best Companies for the Future” ranking isn’t AT&T’s overall rank of 375.

It’s the Talent rank of 390.

The WSJ’s methodology specifically looked at hiring, retention, and employee satisfaction as part of future readiness. In other words, human capital.

For years employees have been saying the same thing, excessive RTO mandates, constant uncertainty, forced relocations, and a lack of flexibility are driving good people out the door.

Leadership ignored it.

Now a respected third-party ranking is essentially saying the same thing. AT&T isn’t being viewed as a future-ready talent organization. It’s being viewed as a company struggling to attract, retain, and develop the workforce it needs for the future.

Even Kevin O’Leary (hardly a champion of employee entitlement) recently warned that companies risk losing their best talent when they become overly rigid about RTO and where work gets done. His point was simple - if you make flexibility a non-starter with RTO, your talent pool shrinks and you will only attract the undesirable bottom quartile of talent nobody else wants.

And that’s exactly what many of us have watched happen… I’ve never seen this many experienced employees leave. At the same time, a strict 5-day RTO policy isn’t a selling point to younger workers who increasingly value flexibility and work-life balance, it’s a detractor and immediate non-starter. Nobody with other options will ever sign up for this prison-like micromanagement.

Talent rank 390 isn’t the cause of the problem. It’s a symptom of this bad policy.

You can mandate badge swipes. You can mandate presence. You can mandate commutes, but what you can’t mandate is that talented people choose to work here, or stay here.

At some point leadership has to ask whether a five-day RTO policy is helping build the future, or helping explain why we’re ranked near the bottom when talent is measured.

Was in a call yesterday where a vp said "we are locked in a room in sunbury, trying to figure out and setup the new org and reporting lines" for the capital dev team. Seems like we are "reinventing" the wheel again. Incredible waste of time and resources, whilst some leaders egos (and pockets) get boosted. So fatiguing.

A long time well respected veteran retiring ...an unqualified minion chosen = disaster waiting to happen

A single capable person? If there is, who is it?

You wouldn't believe how many talented people are stuck here doing nothing useful because management won't get out of their own way. They constantly override the people who actually understand the details and then act surprised when nothing works right. After a while, even the best folks just stop caring and go into survival mode because what's the point of trying anymore?

Outside of ignoring problems until they get worse?

Why do industry observers and specifically BP staff automatically give high praise to Meg? Can one person from the outside manage to upright a failed strategy and a culture which abhors change?

I report to someone, but after they flattened the hierarchy and got rid of all the middle managers I ended up reporting directly to the director in my org.

He's not interested in or capable of leading a team. I never see him except during our monthly 1:1 (which is basically just a monthly recap so he can tell his boss what I do).

There's no leadership here at 3M anymore. Just a bunch of disinterested, self-important jagoffs having meetings because they didn't know what else to do. And nobody can get promoted, so it's never to change.

I’ve been here long enough to notice how often the company seems to shift based on the latest trend. Some trends fade fast, while others stick around much longer, and I don’t think we always know which is which. I wish leadership would think further ahead instead of treating every new moment like the whole strategy.

My last day can’t come soon enough. This has to be the worst sales leadership in the whole industry. My 5 year old grandkid could do a better job than the SVP and he doesn’t whine n’ cry as much.

Cronyism rules! Very bad leadership except in IT. Then UHG bought them and allowed them to be over two established groups and they tanked those groups. This company brought a massive breach, which is public information, they also brought a “l@wsuit” over their claims system. The breach has caused so many layoffs yet their leaders keep their jobs because they have the ability to pick who gets laid of. Toxic group!

Should be exactly what its always been, "The Fleecing of Lumen Humans" . She might as well tell the truth while she lines her pockets.

Curious people’s thoughts or knowledge of Gunjans announcement from last week announcing the new AiDI org and the change of moving Ankit under CBB product. Seems like a big change that will shift how we work but can’t quite piece it all together, and if it’s viewed as a positive move. What say you, layoff people?

Kyndryl is dishing out shares worth hundreds of thousands of dollars to execs in the middle of a redundancy program

CEO Schroeter's latest stock award takes his total tally to 2.449 million shares. Likewise, Keinan now owns 1.603 million and Chugh 184,455.

The average wage paid to a Kyndryl employee in 2025 was $39,464 versus $15.8 million awarded to Schroeter

https://www.theregister.com/on-prem/2026/06/09/kyndryl-showers-execs-with-shares-while-staff-ponder-redundancy-packages/5252181

I’ve been here long enough to see how decisions get made, and it doesn’t feel great at all. A small circle seems to have most of the influence, while everyone else just waits to see what changes next. I know no company is perfect, but I’d like to be somewhere that treats employees as more than expenses. At this point, I’m thinking it may be time to look around.

We lack vision and long term planning. We opt for layoffs because it's the easiest option to free up capital when our stock is going down the drain. We forget that the employees that we let go have context and knowledge domain expertise. By the time we realize, we're going to try and patch it up with rehiring but getting ramped up and onboarding takes time. At the end of it, we would have lost capital, opportunity cost and market share. I genuinely want to know who is driving our transformation and strategy? Are there not any business case studies we can look at? How many companies have successfully pivoted away from third-parties to DTC? Even Apple sells their products at other stores. How many companies have succeeded in GC? For a company of this caliber, I would have expected that we have some risk-based assessment when making these plans. I'm sure Nike would have its own Harvard business case study one day at this point.

@kp+1krea8g33 hits the nail on the head.

You can't slash decades of collective knowledge for a small budget win over and over again and then look confused when everything starts falling apart. That isn't bad luck, that is the direct result of your own choice.

I am consistently astonished to observe that during every layoff at Walmart, none of the leadership seems to be affected for an extended period; they often return to the same position or role at Walmart after being impacted.

Positions such as Directors, Senior Directors, Group Directors, VPs, and SVPs are rarely affected here at Walmart. Additionally, their employer benefits could potentially save hundreds of jobs for individual contributors who genuinely provide significant value to the organization.

Ultimately, it is the individual contributors who truly bear the brunt of these layoffs.

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang publicly praised Qualcomm’s mobile capabilities and humorously told investors to "buy their stock", Nvidia simultaneously announced the RTX Spark superchip to target the "Windows on Arm" PC market.

Meg just announced the structure of the new Organisation

“From )1 July, we will move to an Upstream and Downstream operating model, replacing our current structure of Production & Operations (P&O), Gas & Low Carbon Energy (G&LCE), and Customer & Products (C&P).”

Now - here is where the jokers lay:

GB is now “EVP, Upstream”
RH is “interim” EVP, Downstream

These are the only two gents listed so far…

What are waiting for and why are you so passive? Shareholders have been wiped out and you seem like all is fine. Not it is not! There is one scoreboard for a public company and you are losing. You will be out of a job at some point unless you take decisive action. This company need to be broken up into to pieces (Merchant and FI). Your team is not capable of dealing with the size and complexity as it is comprised today.

AC and his direct leadership team represent a significant leadership investment, yet employees continue to ask a simple question: What measurable value has been delivered from the cloud migration program?

The organization has become increasingly management-heavy, with governance and project management often taking precedence over technical leadership and engineering execution. Many engineers feel that recognition and rewards are concentrated within leadership, while delivery teams carry the majority of the execution burden.

Before investing further in new transformation initiatives, Gunjan should push Dilip to review and reorganize this organization, assess its effectiveness, and ensure leadership costs, accountability, and business outcomes are properly aligned.

Just saw a post on LinkedIn that was

Excited to share my next chapter at Xerox! And then the post went on to share that this person moved into a director role and how they will continue to help Xerox on the transformation journey.

What wasn’t said but I bet is true: 1) this person is part of the 20% moving up at Xerox 2) while others whine about no pay raises this person created their pay raise 3) this person will continue to change Xerox for the better.

Congrats to another 20% worker changing our company for the better. Yes this was posted in the last 24 hours and this person moved into a new position after a round of lay offs.

I got employee appreciation messages today from three leaders at different levels in my group. When I pasted them into Pangram.com, I learned they were ALL 100% AI generated!!! Really diminishes the impact, which was weak to begin with...

Kelly King and Bumbling Bill made an agreement when Gargamel took over that he wouldn’t remove the pension for 10 years. Not sure if that was the day of the merger or the day Gargamel took over. But the pension will cease to exist in way less than 10 years.

The question isn’t why they’re leaving. The question is… what do they know that you don’t?

Morale is collapsing. Talent is walking out the door. People spend more time worrying about where their job might be moved next than how to grow the business. RTO and FTW are a major distraction and ruining what’s left of the company.

Meanwhile, leadership remains fixated on RTO, badge swipes, and presence reports as the company continues to lose ground.

RTO hasn’t created growth. It hasn’t created innovation. It hasn’t improved execution. It’s become a distraction from the real problems and significantly reduced hours. I can’t get in contact with anyone in the afternoon anymore.

At a time when the company needs stability, focus, and a reason for people to stay, leadership is kicking the company while it’s already down.

You can’t attract new young talent when you have prison policy. Nobody worthwhile is willingly signing up for this.

Our VP ..HT.. announced he is leaving. I was told he's an ahole but even he couldn't put up with the bigger ahole that's now his Boss. Yes Sh--Charity managed to scare away even Thakkar. Rumour has it they had a falling out. Pure SH-TSHOW!

CRM here. We are overwhelmed. Supporting 70 plans is way too much. My friend at Voya who is in a similar role has 36 plans. Plus, they have a CRM assistant. We have nothing like that & need it. No wonder the company can't retain clients. Many of us are fed up. Our leadership is out of touch & checked out. Leaders only pay lip service to our needs.