#culture

Posts mentioning hashtag #culture

Below are all the posts — topics as well as replies — that mention the hashtag #culture.

Mention #culture in your post to continue the discussion!

Do not trust fellows

After leaving Chevron, I learned the hard way that you really need to be careful about who you trust. Even people who seem very supportive, offering to help with your resume, connect you to Society of Petroleum Engineers committees, review papers, or ask about your job search may not always have your best interests in mind.

Please protect your information. Don’t share detailed resumes, job search updates, new company plans, or paper drafts unless you fully trust the person and understand why they need that information. Keep things professional and limited.


Organizational restructuring needed

Qualcomm needs a comprehensive organizational restructuring to stay competitive in the rapidly evolving semiconductor industry. The company should streamline its structure, reduce layers of management, and build a leaner, faster decision-making organization. This may require a workforce reduction of around 30%, particularly focusing on eliminating unproductive senior and staff engineers who are sitting there for years, and aligning and recruiting new graduate talents with future growth areas.

The leadership team must be refreshed with a forward-looking CEO who deeply understands the future of semiconductors including AI acceleration, edge computing, advanced node design, chiplet architectures, automotive platforms, and custom silicon. The new strategy should prioritize innovation speed, stronger execution discipline, and accountability at all levels.

Key additional priorities should include:
Reducing bureaucratic overhead and simplifying reporting structures
Investing aggressively in AI-driven chip design and next-generation architectures
Strengthening partnerships in automotive, IoT, and data center markets
Improving cost discipline and capital allocation efficiency
Retaining and rewarding high-performing engineers while upskilling talent in critical future technologies
Encouraging an ownership-driven, performance-based culture

A leaner, technology-focused, and execution-oriented Qualcomm can regain stronger market leadership and shareholder confidence.


Remember when they used to actually tell us the truth?

I sat in a meeting with a manager where they literally told us no layoffs coming. Not two weeks later, people were getting cut. What is even the point of these meetings anymore? The whole culture is just fear now. You can't trust a word that comes out of their mouths.


Life at Solventum vs 3M

As an ex HCB sales person who got "stuck" at 3M I still follow all my old European colleagues on Linkedin. Life looks amazing at Solventum! It's seems like unlimited travel and many chances to get together and meet in person at amazing high end conferences. At 3M we can't go anywhere . But then I come on here and it's all doom and gloom , seems like the two things be true so which one is it ???


10+ hour days and it's still not enough to get through the workload

Management talks to us like we're machines, not people. The pay doesn't come close to matching what peers make elsewhere. Add in the constant pressure and zero respect, and it's getting harder to remember why I stay. The only thing keeping me going is the team, but even that's starting to fray.


My honest take on working at HCSC

Between the constant cost cutting and the obvious favoritism, this place is tough to navigate. If you're not in with the right people, your work just doesn't seem to matter. Leadership feels disconnected and the culture has turned pretty toxic. I wouldn't recommend coming here based on what I've seen.


DreadGrid.com

Found this site where you can anonymously rate your job on two axes. One is how hard the work actually is and the other is how bad the people are to deal with. They call it Pain Level and A--hole Coefficient which honestly tracks.
Would be interesting to see where Google lands right now given everything going on.


Nike Culture is Dead

Bad leadership. Too many leaders do not understand the brand or the mission. They do not care deeply about sport or sneakers. They care about titles and power. They focus on themselves, not the company.

We promoted the wrong people. Then they promoted their friends and loyalists. Now it is people in power protecting each other instead of building the business. When the top is weak, everything below it crumbles.

EH has not reset the organization. The leaders under EH avoid hard decisions. There is a lot of head nodding and very little action. They wait for direction instead of leading. They are not building the future. They are not leaders.

Talent is leaving or has left. The people who care the most get frustrated and walk away. Strong voices are pushed out. The people who stay are comfortable, not outstanding.

There is zero accountability. When we fail at something, there is always an excuse. Market conditions. Timing. Someone else’s decision. No one clearly owns the failure. If no one owns it, nothing changes.

There is no unity. Teams protect their own goals instead of fighting for one mission. The culture is political and siloed. We do not act like one company.

This is the norm now. This is the new Nike culture.


This company is dying, leadership has no intention to recover, get out while you can.

DXC is dying, and leadership actions show it has no real intention to recover. DXC keeps a large cash surplus because it’s managing decline, not investing in people or growth.

Cash provides leadership with flexibility and protection as the business is in a managed decline.
• Build cash reserves → no investment → No plan for the future
• Only 'investment' is in Sales and Customer Experience centers to give an impression of investment - no real investment in offering innovation, people or value for clients
• No pay rises → avoids permanent costs
• Overpaid execs + buybacks → boost EPS and hit bonus targets
• Big cash pile → protects credit rating, reassures clients, funds restructuring
• Buyback investment → financial optics over long-term capability

In summary:
DXC is choosing control and shareholder optics over investing in itself or its people. DXC leadership is just waiting to cash out - waiting for a buyer, or waiting for someone to identify the very few assets, sell them off, and dispose of the rest.


**Presence Report**

The latest version of the presence report contains a significant error. It assumes that all employees require 5 days of office presence; however, some organizations require only 3 days.

This tool fails to account for this variability and applies the five-day requirement uniformly. As a result, it inaccurately lowers the overall office presence percentage for teams operating under a three-day model. It is time to retire this ineffective tool, as it has repeatedly failed to produce accurate results.


Where is the validation?

I was let go in Jan by an a--hole, he's a--hole not only as per me, according to his peers,my peers (his direct reports) his manager all of them. After this also I was let go, my team members were grateful (scared) to be saved. His peers didn't say anything as they wanted to be safe. His manager (my skip manager) only wants to cut cut cut. My question is who's validating that who's being let go and whom are they saving?


Reviews deliberately low to lower merit

When I was ranking my people, I was specifically told I had to rank on a curve and could only have so many people at the top and had to have a specific percent below a three to allow for lower rating and merit. I didn’t agree with this, but did as I was asked only to receive my review and while it was numerically fine , the commentary was definitely neutral this year versus positive as it has been over the past 8 years of my being here. It seems this is deliberate and my guess is this is a way to have layoffs in the future and justify lower merit overall. Welcome to the GTM strategy of CDW. Let’s take that unlimited PTO while we can because soon enough we won’t be here anyhow. It’s just sad.


Loyalty and hard work

Exxon considers themselves to be even every time they send a paycheck. No loyalty. No consideration of the late nights or weekend work. No consideration of the weeks away from home traveling. Work your 8 hours a day and then log off. No one notices your hard work. No one will reward your extra effort. Stop caring so much.


If you thought being an employee was bad...

just wait until you leave and are a client! No wonder people hate TIAA. Trying to get anything done is is darn near impossible, your money is locked up in under performing produts, withdrawl options are nil, client services is horrendous and een simple changes take forever. I'm embarassed to have worked there fo ras long as I did. Thank God I left. Knowing what I know now, I'd never tell anyone to put money at TIAA. It's a joke.


We are all being gaslighted

So after the C suite took cash earned from ERP from 168 to 112 to fund future projects, removed raises, tanked the share price of the company impacting pay of anyone with any equity, doing constant layoffs....

The next thing we are being told is we are about to get a lesson on the Stoics? Yes, this is true. We need to compare ourselves to philosophers from 300 BC and ignore all this nonsense and see it all in a positive light. That is coming from the top.


This is INSANE!…

Supplemental CEO Equity Award

On February 18, 2026, the independent members of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Fiserv, Inc. (the “Company”), consistent with the recommendation of the Talent and Compensation Committee of the Board, awarded Michael P. Lyons, Chief Executive Officer, a supplemental equity award (the “Award”) consisting of performance share units (“PSUs”) and time-vesting restricted stock units (“RSUs”). The Award reflects the Board’s recognition of the importance of Mr. Lyons’s ongoing leadership in successfully executing key strategic actions to transform the Company, including the One Fiserv action plan designed to drive long-term growth and position the Company for future success.

The Award is structured to promote the retention of Mr. Lyons as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and align his incentive opportunity with Fiserv’s absolute and relative shareholder value creation over the long term. The PSUs, which have a grant date value of approximately $18 million, will cliff vest after three years subject to achievement of performance goals tied to relative total shareholder return and the One Fiserv action plan. Specific measurable performance metrics for the One Fiserv action plan will be set at a later date in connection with Company’s 2026 investor day. The RSUs, which have a grant date value of approximately $12 million, will vest pro-rata on the first three anniversaries of the grant date.

The Award is in addition to the approximately $18.7 million annual equity incentive award granted to Mr. Lyons on the same date, comprised 60% of PSUs, which will cliff vest after three years subject to achievement of performance goals tied to relative total shareholder return, adjusted revenue growth, adjusted earnings per share, and free cash flow conversion, and 40% of RSUs, which will vest pro-rata on the first three anniversaries of the grant date.

The forgoing summary of the Award is qualified in all respects by reference to the text of the award agreements that govern the Award, forms of which are filed as Exhibits 10.4 and 10.18 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 19, 2026 and are incorporated herein by reference.
—————————————————————-
Oh my, so this guy is getting a $50mm compensation package??? 95% of which composed of our stock at this nosebleedingly cheap multiple??? This guy IS worse than Frank even, Frank’s package is not nearly half as big! This guy has probably bullied the board in a lionized way to get his way. Even Jamie Dimon at JP Morgan, with a market cap 10 times as big as Fiserv, does NOT get a package like this!!!
Our company is in worse hands!!! RUN!!!


Unsolicited Advice...To Elevance Health

If this company truly wants to grow its market, it must take a hard look at the people directors leading its teams. These leaders have a direct and measurable impact on team performance. Ignoring this level of leadership has not produced meaningful gains so far, and it will not do so in the future. You have leaders that do not show up for work or for their teams. Why would any company pay leaders not to show up? It would serve the company well to undertake the necessary, perhaps uncomfortable, work to address this now, unless the intention is to continue falling short with full awareness of the cause.

And to be clear, this post is not intended to solicit responses from people directors who may feel personally offended by this perspective. The focus should remain on results, accountability, and the long-term success of the organization, not on individual sensitivities.


DXC asset recovery

I left my assignment a year ago and moved to another business that seems to actually pay a decent packet for what Im doing, encourage anyone else to7 do the same

When I left, the only thing DXC bothered claiming was the laptop. My screen, 2 customer devices, an old workstation zbook and a few other things went with me
The way I see it, compensation for unpaid hours and poor treatment. Doesnt come close to thousands theyve had off me and others for free, but there

it really is shocking, isnt it?


Forced ranking

I wont say much apart from this one thing “do you not know mike that your mc’s force people down to needs improvement when they really are not bad performers”

Because of my rating I am feeling sui-idal. My manager even said that they were forced to and that nothing is wrong. So Mike do you not know that this messes with peoples lives. Do you not fu--ing know.


Glad I got out. Hope you can do the same.

The content I read here continues to assure me I made the right choice by taking ERP. So many comments reflect how I felt for years after donating my time playing the NRG/Buzz-Yammer/Bold Goal/Community Day/volunteer game, thinking it would get me somewhere.

Loyalty and long-term efforts used to mean something. No more, which is why the decision I made last summer was an easy and immediate one. Especially with the current batch of self-esteem as-----ns.


new leadership and direction is needed

leadership havent evolved in the last 10+ years. For a company that is hyper focused on money making strategy over and above technology strategy, the pivot should be to high margin software. IBM and HPE constantly acquire software companies and are better for it. JC is a one trick pony and every leader beneath are 'yes men' who are only concerned with their next options or rsu allocation. Bring in some fresh blood and wake up ya muppets!


I feel so sad today (reposting as previous post got messed up on my phone)

I am approaching a seven-year tenure on my team and I have long found solace in our shared atmosphere. Everyone is remarkably kind and approachable. Although we have recently encountered adverse shifts beyond our control, I have remained a steadfast advocate for collective resilience despite the prevailing negativity because I deeply honor the journey that defined every teammate’s professional growth.

Finally today, I have fully grasped the irony that the more one ventures above and beyond, the heavier the burden of responsibility becomes. If you fail to navigate the unspoken rules of the game, you bear the most devastating fall. I have never experienced such poignant disappointment and I recognize it is finally time to part ways with those who fail to safeguard what is truly essential.

By no means am I suggesting that I am the most indispensable and irreplaceable asset here as there are far more brilliant minds within this organization than myself. Rather, it is the professional spirit and the arduous paths we have chosen to walk, that merit profound respect and should be held in high regard.


I feel so sad today

I am approaching a seven-year tenure on my team and I have long found solace in our shared atmosphere. Everyone is remarkably kind and approachable. Although we have recently encountered adverse shifts beyond our control, I have remained a steadfast advocate for collective resilience despite the prevailing negativity because I deeply honor the journey that defined every teammate’s professional growth.


M-rating

I received an M rating, and people are telling me it’s bad? . I’m the smartest person on my team and my “boss” is an unqualified Saudi woman. I’ve emailed her boss and told him as much, but I don’t know if that will help? To those of you considering coming here, be mindful they prioritize their own despite how much value you may add.