#leadership

John is the ultimate salesman. Let's wait to see how many promises he made in today's video about HQ actually sound true. They make it sound like a Mecca for those in Dallas. I've heard this story before.

What is tomorrow's townhall going to be all about? It's terrible fearing ELT meetings because I used to look forward to them. Fear is probably the new norm after what we all went through last year.

It's so lame both leaders are not even making eye contact. RA doesn't want to talk about his demotion. Hopefully, they are finding a replacement to consolidate all compliance departments.

Surprise OPW & New England management consolidation coming up. Get ready for the next round of leadership confusion!

CPO seems to just share LinkedIn articles on how AI is coming for our jobs instead of setting any actual strategy. This whole company is a mess.

While we are spinning our wheels.

Who, on the exec side, is responsible for this?

The company value is decreasing - steady.
Now Dxc is worth only 2.2 B$.

When will the next CEO come bring his cronies?

No conflict of interest at all, right?

Right?

Bro has money poisoning.

My favorite quote: "Directors of companies registered in Delaware, as UnitedHealth is, have a “duty of loyalty”—an obligation to put the company’s interests ahead of their own. A director who invests personally in a startup in the same industry without first clearing it with his company could be breaching that duty, legal experts say."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/unitedhealth-chief-made-private-side-bets-on-healthcare-startups/ar-AA1Wucr8

The board has toppled Hans the ringmaster. Without his costume and whip in hand the Tiger gets run of the show. What a welcome turn of events.

Don’t think if you don’t hear today that you’re in the clear. I’m told all 2/17 announcements were pushed to 2/18 because leadership didn't want John to have to field questions at his Open Mic today. So, announcements go out tomorrow, 2/18. Last day on payroll 3/4.

New leaders will come up with a aligned strategy to transform this organization. That also means coming up metrics that can be measured consistently and monitored. Next six months are critical for the company. I assume there might be further reductions due to realignment but time will tell.

Today, I just expect them to introduce department leaders and vision & mission for each department.

We all have to contribute tremendously to turn this company around. If we don’t then there is a risk that we wont have the “W” near our house.

What you can do to save yourself from layoff is to make their strategy successful.
You can work hard but working smart and being strategic is more important.

He has done such a great job at Ford, he has been anointed into the BoD at McDonalds.

The guy is a "1" performer.

BILLIONS and BILLIONS of losses in the last few years with this EV bullsh-t and what? Here at Ford, its nothing but applause.

Belk has resorted to hiring managers with no real skills or management power, it seems like they regurgitate what is said in emails or conference calls yet make no effort to follow up on any issues in the store. Many employees have complained that their store managers are lacking skills, knowledge, and motivation to successfully run their store, some sales team managers, merch team managers, leads, and key holders have voiced concern that they are the ones running the stores, yet the store manager is taking credit and being compensated for their hard work. The question is who is hiring these ineffective store managers ? and why? It’s of great concern when the leads, associates, and floor managers care more and know more about their store than the actual store manager.

I'm hearing the APAC teams are really struggling under the new leader. From all reports the previous "interim" chief was bad but the new guy and his posse are driving the culture into the ground. Anyone hearing the same?

Last minute invite to short meeting tomorrow morning for EIP. Is there a new SVP?

I saw this post earlier and thought it was worth to share here. When Nintendo faced disappointing sales during the Wii U era, the company’s leadership made an unusual decision.
Instead of reducing staff, then, president Satoru Iwata voluntarily cut his own salary, and other executives also accepted pay reductions.
The move was meant to protect employees, maintain morale, and preserve the creative culture that Nintendo believed was essential for long-term success. It became a widely discussed example of leadership taking responsibility during difficult financial periods rather than passing the burden directly onto workers.

They haven’t been pushed out. They haven’t been removed from “power”. They have been given newly created positions.

Conspiracy, or coincidence?

Any normal person would have thought they would be sent off with the old guard, but do they know too much?

RB just said he starts and ends his day using Copliot and has 6 agents running at all times. Senior leadership is completely brain dead, which we already knew but now it’s being directly told to us.

Just curious, honestly did anyone get a promo? Not much was disclosed on the process and frontline managers given no info. So did anyone actually get one and what criteria was there? Were they only given to people now in managerial roles?

Seems like a huge team with 10 SVPs.. What's their plan?

https://variety.com/2026/biz/news/warner-bros-discovery-paramount-skydance-board-bid-netflix-1236664163/?fbclid=IwdGRjcAQAELpleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEedi07M5OTw_-C4AkreI9eONQXAhDT4y1e1dgY62kHS4qi-9-PloLepzKypjE_aem_9SNa7lxdHAvM5wtMgTJPTA

I'm a Manager and I have had to lay off top raters over low performers because the leader has a vision. I can tell you, ratings have some sway but ultimately no one is safe from the shoulder tap.

Keep your options open.

They cut and cut and cut, and somehow expect things to keep running smoothly. It doesn't work that way. This company could be great, but leadership is ki-ling it one layoff at a time.

Giant Eagle used to care about its people. Now we’re at the point where employees are treated no better than they are at Walmart. It’s genuinely sad to see how far this workplace has fallen when it comes to its workers. This leadership should be ashamed.

Apparently you can't just tell someone to do something anymore. You have to wrap it in praise and compliments or they think you're attacking them. I'm not yelling, I'm just asking you to work. When did that become a problem?

It’s by far the worst experience I’ve had in my professional life. I’m in CWP, leadership is ineffectual, they do absolutely nothing but the bare minimum, just enough to keep their job. They won’t care about their teams, they don’t care about doing what’s right for the members , they just do the bare minimum to keep their job. It’s atrocious and shocking for a company of this size to allow leaders to behave the way they do, I don’t even feel like I have a manager or any sort of support system. I cannot wait to quit this nightmare of a company, The really sad part is I’m one of the few people that other job, follow the rules and the people that do whatever they want aren’t held accountable. It’s only a matter of time before a member takes legal action due to the irresponsibility of most of the staff.

Bumping from @2hr+1kd1d6bb6, well stated.

CEO Andy Jassy faces criticism for a perceived lack of investor communication and strategic vision, especially concerning the return on heavy AI investments, leading some to call for leadership change.

From my experience Chevron has NO keepers by the definition shared at the link below.

If you disagree please speak up and advise me on where to find a "keeper " among the cesspool of self serving supervision/ managers we are blessed with.

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/jwmba_when-your-manager-says-this-youve-got-a-share-7428287024773636096-rO6r?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_android&rcm=ACoAAAn-ZlAB68ih04bqOWRtU6SN072zGx8h3RY

What 3 things does Meg need to initiate and accomplish in her first 90 days will set the tone for her administration and direction.

Year after year, we see the same pattern: failed decisions, failed projects, failed products, failed initiatives, failed policies. The outcomes are consistent — underperformance and disruption.

Yet the accountability is not.

Senior leaders are rarely, if ever, held responsible for these failures. Instead, rank-and-file employees absorb the consequences — blamed, terminated, or laid off while the architects of these poor decisions remain untouched.

How does this culture persist? When poor judgment repeatedly goes unchecked at the top, it raises serious questions about governance, transparency, and whether advancement is based on merit or internal favoritism.

Failure at Dell has become all too systemic — and predictable.

I’m about 9 months into HCSC. I heard mixed reviews about the organization before I joined. My immediate team is friendly and professional, but it seems the company as a whole is dysfunctional. There is no accountability and no one really knows who does what. I heard before that HCSC routinely hires from outside of the health insurance industry because they can’t attract and retain specialized talent. It appears to me to be the case. It seems like there are a lot of people who have been here for many many years and lots of churn with newer talent.

Serious question—- why do people stay for so long? Doesn’t the dysfunction and lack of leadership get to you? It seems to be to a culture of complacency and sticking to a false narrative than actually trying to run an excellent business.

Imagine a man who is the pillar of his family — the sole breadwinner, paying the mortgage, managing expenses, carrying the quiet weight of responsibility every single day. Now imagine him being laid off.

He walks back home, opens the door, and looks into the eyes of his wife and children. In that moment, his heart shatters — not because he has failed, but because he knows that even fulfilling the most basic needs of his family is about to become a battle.

Layoffs are brutal. They are not just headlines to scroll past. They are not numbers on a spreadsheet. They can shake the foundation of a family, robbing them of peace, security, and joy.

Dear employers, I understand that layoffs can sometimes be necessary — when companies are struggling financially or when performance standards are not being met. But letting people go purely to increase profits, driven by sheer greed, is not leadership. It is a failure of humanity.

Businesses grow because of people. We earn from our communities, and in return, we have a responsibility to serve and strengthen those very communities. Displacing our own people to chase greater margins while ignoring the human cost is short-sighted and unjust.

Build your people. Build your community. Build your nation.

When you uplift those around you, they will uphold you in return.

Ask not what your company can do for you — ask what you can do for your company?

Viva Las Vegas, Baby! #LeadingWithCompassion

Are promotions based on performance, or is it just a leadership friendship club benefit?

Rahul should be fired, he lacks creativity . No success at all. He is pocketing all the money from vendor kickbacks for hiring H1Bs.

Kroger, the largest traditional supermarket chain in the United States, has appointed Greg Foran as its new Chief Executive Officer following a year-long search. Foran is best known for running Walmart’s U.S. operations from 2014 to 2019, where he oversaw a turnaround that delivered 20 consecutive quarters of comparable sales growth across more than 4,600 stores. His appointment signals that Kroger is looking to borrow from its biggest rival’s playbook as the grocery wars intensify.

https://www.whatjobs.com/news/kroger-names-former-walmart-executive-greg-foran-as-ceo-to-lead-the-grocery-giant-through-intensifying-competition/

Another bad 10 years are coming due to QPOET.

Don’t say that one obnoxious team will not have big impact. Please keep in mind that toxicity is contagious.

Time will give the opposition a lesson. It actually already had!

Sorry for all of those affected. I’m really surprised so many UX positions were eliminated. This feels like a failure on UX leadership to represent and advocate for the function of UX throughout the business.