#culture

Posts mentioning hashtag #culture

Below are all the posts — topics as well as replies — that mention the hashtag #culture.

Mention #culture in your post to continue the discussion!

Advice to Management:

Although I’m no longer with Centene, I still care deeply about its mission and the people working to achieve it. That’s why I’m taking the time to write this.

One pattern I’ve seen across large organizations is the belief that the next framework, consulting engagement, or AI initiative will unlock better execution. Those things all have value. They bring fresh ideas, experience, and structure. But none of them can replace organizational clarity.

When priorities change faster than results can be measured, it becomes difficult to know what actually worked. Strategies get replaced before they can be fairly evaluated, and organizations end up changing multiple variables at the same time. At that point, you’re no longer learning from the strategy. You’re learning from the interruption.

From the individual contributor’s perspective, people stop asking, “Is this the right direction?” and start asking, ”How long until this changes again?” Eventually they stop optimizing for outcomes and start optimizing for adaptability. That’s not resistance to change. It’s a rational response to uncertainty.

The same challenge applies to outside consultants. They can bring experience, structure, and proven approaches, but they can’t create clarity where it doesn’t already exist. If priorities, success measures, and strategic direction continue to shift, even great recommendations struggle because the organization is still redefining the problem they were brought in to solve.

Landing the plane…

If I could offer one piece of advice, it would be this.

Create the conditions for success before looking for the next solution.

Define what success looks like.

Decide how you’ll measure it.

Give your managers and teams enough stability to execute.

Give the strategy enough time to produce meaningful results.

Then let the data, not the calendar, tell you what needs to change next.

Frameworks matter.

Technology matters.

Consultants matter.

  • Employees matter most.*

Every reorganization, every strategy shift, and every new operating model is experienced by people who care deeply about the mission and genuinely want to do great work. When people lose confidence that today’s priority will still matter tomorrow, the organization loses something much harder to rebuild than a process. It loses trust.

To everyone still there, don’t lose sight of why you chose this work in the first place. Your knowledge, your compassion, and your commitment to members still matter. Those things don’t disappear because the organization is going through change.

I sincerely hope Centene succeeds. The mission is too important, and there are too many good people working every day to make a difference. My hope for leadership is simple: create the clarity, stability, and trust that allows those people to do what they’ve always wanted to do…serve members, support one another, and do their best work.

✌️

  • AI helped me tighten the writing. The observations, opinions, and experiences are my own.*

Who's left that's considered a leader?

Being with Canon for so many years, I believe and feel we still have some inspiring leaders, maybe not enough of them, but we have hope with the ones that still hopefully remain in place. I know the site is filled with negativity right now, and I understand, but maybe one post that offers some positive light at the end of the tunnel will help? Who's your favorite leader by initial only and group?


AITECH & AIBIZ: Devaluing Engineers

Cisco AITECH offers a free, 15-hour crash course and AIBIZ providing only high-level business concepts without a formal exam!

Translation: loss of company $$$ + a way to bypass hiring qualified engineers, allowing non-technical managers to fake technical expertise and undermine the value of a rigorous engineering degree.

ONLY Cisco did this. Top companies knew better.

  • 95% of AI pilots fail to deliver measurable profit-and-loss impact is accurate, sourced from the MIT NANDA report.

  • Despite $30–40 billion in enterprise investment, only 5% of integrated AI pilots extract measurable value.

  • Harvard Business Review says AI is flooding workflows with low-quality output that requires more human intervention to validate, creating a net loss in productivity.

Bottom Line - products, sales fail because they treat AI as a plug-in tool.


Are people avoiding Oracle these days?

We've been trying to fill a role for months, and we've gotten almost no qualified applicants. It almost feels like qualified people have heard the stories, know what it's like here, and are staying away as a result. We desperately need help, but I don't think we'll get it anytime soon.


Things are getting out of control

I'm so tired of being punished every time I take a little extra time to help a customer. We're not working in a manufacturing factory. We're not working on a conveyor belt. I need to be able to interact with people without worrying that it's going to cause problems with my manager.


UKI Leadership Call, did you attend? Vote up for yes or down for no.

Don’t normally attend these monthly calls but decided to tune in today. Well that was an hour wasted. Mainly insufferable people droning on in corporate speak about absolute BS. Main takeaway was hearing that 400 UK staff are on a PIP? Is this bell curve requirements, something for middle managers to do, a tick box exercise or all 3? Oh and not a word about pay review.


Londonderry - Avoid like the plague

Since my last post got deleted, I won't go into specifics but the Londonderry office is a disaster. Lots of managers and senior people leaving. Morale extremely low.

I have worked at 4 other places in my career and the negativity flowing through this one is the worst. Please avoid IVS.


A SITH SHOW AT META

  1. Meta's CTO, Andrew Bosworth, admitted the company's AI reorganization was poorly communicated and that leadership did "an atrocious job explaining the vision."

https://www.inc.com/jessica-stillman/the-worst-its-ever-been-why-metas-massive-ai-reorg-backfired-spectacularly/91363370

  1. Bosworth acknowledged employee morale has likely reached "the worst it's ever been."

  2. The new Applied AI division left many engineers feeling directionless, unsupported, and disconnected from leadership.

  3. One major problem was excessively large management spans, with some managers overseeing well over 20 direct reports.

  4. Employees reported feeling like anonymous members of oversized, hastily assembled teams rather than valued contributors.

  5. Meta now plans to cap managers at roughly 20 direct reports, reduce unnecessary manager changes during reorganizations, and introduce AI coaching tools.

  6. Organizational psychologist Bob Sutton noted that research has long shown large teams suffer from coordination, collaboration, and communication problems.

  7. Studies indicate that smaller teams are particularly important for creative, innovative, and highly interdependent work like AI development.

  8. Research covering more than 50 million papers, patents, and software projects found teams with fewer than five members were most likely to produce disruptive innovations.

  9. The article compares Meta's situation to Jeff Bezos' "Two Pizza Rule," which advocates keeping teams small enough to be fed with two pizzas.

  10. As Amazon evolved, it shifted toward assigning a single accountable leader to large initiatives while preserving clear ownership and coordination.

  11. Meta's reorganization appears to have done neither: teams remained very large without strong centralized ownership, contributing to confusion and declining morale.

  12. The article warns that current trends toward eliminating middle management can backfire, particularly in knowledge work requiring creativity and close collaboration.

  13. Leadership coach Beth Steinberg argues that managers with too many reports cannot effectively coach, develop, or support employees, leaving them only able to push work forward.

  14. The overall lesson is that organizations seeking flatter structures should carefully balance efficiency with effective management, communication, and team size, especially in innovation-driven environments like AI.


SpaceX-Leadership and culture

From another post-Gotta love Elon

Is Elon Musk laying off employees?
AI Overview

3
Yes, Elon Musk has fired a significant number of employees across his companies over the years. His major workforce reductions include:
X (formerly Twitter): Following his acquisition of the company, Musk eliminated roughly 80% of the platform's workforce through a combination of abrupt firings, mass layoffs, and stringent ultimatums (e.g., demanding employees commit to an "extremely hardcore" work environment or resign).
Aura Intelligence

  • 1
    Tesla: The company laid off over 10% of its global workforce amid a restructuring phase.

YouTube
SpaceX: Musk has fired employees at his aerospace company, which has also drawn legal complaints from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) regarding the alleged unlawful termination of staff who were critical of his behavior.

YouTube
·CBC News
Federal Government: Musk heavily participated in federal workforce reduction efforts, including the controversial dismissal of thousands of federal agency personnel and administrative worakers


Why Space X will put this company out of business

The biggest difference between the two companies isn’t technology. It isn’t strategy. It’s leadership and culture.

At SpaceX, employees are working toward a clear mission. People know the goal, understand the direction, and believe they’re building something important. Here, the only mission we’re working on is RTO and presence reports.

At AT&T, many employees increasingly feel like they’re being blamed for problems they didn’t create.

One of the most common traits of failing leadership is scapegoating. When results disappoint, instead of asking whether the strategy is wrong, leaders look for someone else to blame. Employees become the problem. Feedback becomes the problem. Dissent becomes the problem.

That’s why the 8/1/25 email struck such a nerve and why everyone here is checked out. His message to the employee base was “You don’t matter”.

When employees raised concerns about morale, flexibility, retention, and RTO, the response wasn’t introspection. Employees were told “loyalty is dead” there “might be a disconnect between you and your current professional choice.” Concerns were dismissed as “more outliers than we’d like.”

Many employees read that and saw a leader more interested in defending their bad decision than understanding why so many people opposed it.

Another hallmark of poor leadership is rigidity. Strong leaders adapt when the facts change. Weak leaders treat every challenge to their strategy as a challenge to their authority and it damages their ego. They double down, no matter how much evidence piles up around them that they made a mistake.

Then comes the most dangerous stage, isolation.

Because of the fear of retaliation for pushing back or telling the truth, leaders stop hearing bad news. Dissent gets dismissed. Feedback gets filtered. Executives surround themselves with people who tell them what they want to hear instead of what they need to hear. “Yes men”

A bubble forms, and Inside the bubble, everything is working.

Outside the bubble, morale is collapsing, talent is leaving, recruiting is harder, and competitors are pulling further ahead.

Employees aren’t asking for miracles. They’re asking for basic respect and leadership that listens, adapts, and accepts responsibility when something isn’t working.

Instead, many feel they’re being asked to sacrifice more, commute more, give up flexibility, and then accept blame when the outcomes don’t improve.

The most dangerous thing a CEO can do is become so convinced of his own correctness that he stops hearing what everyone else is telling him.

That’s the disconnect employees have been talking about all along and why another company will soon pass us by.


Entire department forced into AI

I work for corp and it’s been scary watching this AI hype play out over the last few months . It started with managers mentioning copilot very often now it’s turned into department wide training . In any meeting led by a director or above , they literally will start off by saying something like “i used copilot to write my into today”

The part that worries me is they are literally telling us to use it for emails. Eventually the entire department is just gonna be corresponding to eachother with robotic AI garbage .

Sure i understand the power of AI and it can be used in many ways . But to force it down 100+ employees and make them implement into their work stream just feels so weird . I’ve never had less faith in a company than i do now. I’ve frequented this sub for the 5 years I’ve worked here but i never expected it to actually be this weird


Gen Z Faces Post-Layoff Workplace Challenges

Layoffs create significant challenges for remaining Gen Z employees. Many lack the experience and training for new post-layoff responsibilities. This leads to costly mistakes and high rates of considering leaving. Organizations must implement re-onboarding and interactive learning strategies. Peer learning and feedback also help Gen Z adapt and thrive.

https://hrdailyadvisor.hci.org/2026/06/24/gen-z-is-sending-a-warning-about-post-layoff-culture-and-hr-leaders-should-pay-attention/


Stankey and Randall could not run a lemonade stand

It is just extremely frustrating that Stankey is still CEO and Chairman of the board after his business blunders cost the company $106 billion. Employees are held to a high standard and now we have these strict presence reports but the CEO gets a free pass.

Stankey and his predecessor Randall are both not capable of running a lemonade stand on a sunny weekend. But we let Stankey remain CEO of a Fortune 50 company. Randall is now on the board of directors of Walmart after leaving AT&T in shambles.

These board of directors should be ashamed of themselves. They are so far removed from the daily operations of the business to understand what is in best interest of the company. To them it is just a part time position where they get to fly into Dallas and be treated like a celebrity for the week.


They. Do. Not. Care. About. Culture.

They are a failing company thanks to their own doing. Offshoring to India is going to run it into the ground even more. All they care about is the money they line their pockets with. There has been a steady and steep decline to every company that GP touches- in all realms. Profitability, benefits, work life balance, employee retention and satisfaction, etc.

Why wouldn’t gp cut McKinsey loose at this point? It’s known that consultants throw spaghetti at the wall and hope something sticks. But thus far, nothing has even marginally improved by retaining them.

I certainly hope gp is shopping around their vertical markets to sell to keep gp afloat. I do not foresee gp being around for much longer at the rate things are going

Well said, @bm+1kt6r66mv.


A decade of watching them destroy knowledge

The people who actually know how things work are either retiring without documenting anything or getting laid off. And leadership thinks it's fine because they have their VPs. The same VPs who don't know the details and don't want input from anyone below them. It's scary to watch the company make such a huge mistake and not care.


Where is the Senior Leadership team?

Serious question: where is the senior leadership team?

Employees are required to come into the office five days a week, yet it’s rare to see Directors, VPs, or SVPs in the Blue Ash buildings. Are they held to the same in-office expectations as everyone else? If not, what are the expectations? Can our CIO give direction to the entire KTD?

If leadership believes office presence is important enough to mandate, then employees should be able to see that leadership is present as well.


Low Reviews Due to Bell Curve Rating?

An Engineering Director here told us to prepare for low reviews because managers are being forced to rate everyone on their teams using a bell curve, and there is no way around it. This means that even if some people are meeting expectations, they may still be placed in a “needs improvement” category. It feels like Oracle may be preparing for the next RIF or encouraging attrition. Has anyone else heard the same?


Employee Forum June 2026

So, did anyone else leave the employee forum this morning feeling utterly transformed? Because clearly management thinks a few PowerPoint slides and some forced enthusiasm are all it takes to convince us this “transformation” is the best thing since sliced bread. At least they finally admitted the culture is circling the drain—growth, I guess.

And that shiny new building they want to plop down in Scona? A pocket‑sized QP with all the fancy amenities. Because nothing says “we value you” like spending a fortune on a building instead of, you know… fixing the actual problems. Can’t wait to see what astronomical number they pull out of the hat this time.


Stephanie, Bob and TPO message

WTF. A pre-recorded call to let people go is the most cowardly way to treat employees.

People have given countless hours to this company, and this is how they’re repaid? The company is clearly going downhill if this is the standard of leadership and respect being shown.

The very least you could do is thank people for their contributions and explain why these decisions are being made. Instead, employees are treated as if their dedication meant nothing.

Stephanie, Bob, and TPO should be ashamed of how this has been handled. In some cases, people have sacrificed personal time, family time, and even left other jobs to come here, only to be dismissed through a pre-recorded message.

This is inhumane, disrespectful, and completely contrary to any values a company should stand for. The way employees have been treated is absolutely disgusting.


TRP culture is destroying itself

I've never seen anything like it. The leadership is full of people who have no business being in their roles. They've been promoted beyond their ability and they're just making it up as they go. They've created a culture where people just follow along to protect their paychecks. Anyone with real pride in their work would be miserable here. The only reason I'm still here is they pay me well enough to just go through the motions.